1989
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/1/36/009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic structure of Nb-Ta (001) superlattices

Abstract: The authors have calculated the electronic band structure of Nb-Ta (001) superlattices by means of the surface-Green-function-matching method. An empirical tight-binding Hamiltonian including d orbitals and up to second-neighbour interactions is employed. The influences of the interactions at the interfaces and the relative thicknesses of the constituent materials on the superlattice spectrum are studied and discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have applied previously this formalism to surfaces 10,11 , interfaces 12,13 and superlattices 19 . Now we present our results.…”
Section: 3132mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have applied previously this formalism to surfaces 10,11 , interfaces 12,13 and superlattices 19 . Now we present our results.…”
Section: 3132mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous papers, [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] in conjunction with the known surface Green's function matching method (SGFM) 17 , we have used a tight-binding formulation to calculate the electronic band structure, the surface, the surface induced, and the interface states for several systems in a consistent way with the known bulk band structure calculations. The method can also be applied to overlayers, 18 superlattices, 8,19 phonons 20 and to calculate transport properties 21 in heterostructures as quantum wells, for example, by making use of the well known method by Keldysh.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They implemented a set of tight-binding parameters for the series of chalcopyrites CuB III C V I with B = Al, Ga, In and C = S, Se, T e that describe quite accurately the bulk electronic band structure and have been used successfully [9,10] as input to calculate the surface electronic band structure using the Surface Green's Function Matching (SGFM) method [11]. Interfaces [12] and superlattices [13] can also been described successfully by this method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For discrete systems this can be done with great ease from the transfer matrices. The combination of SGFM formalism and transfer matrix algorithms proves very useful in practice, as is seen in many physical applications like electronic states in semiconductor interfaces [4, 51, metal surfaces [6] and semiconductor [7] or metallic [8] superlattices as well as phonons in sandwich structures [9], metal interfaces [IO], periodic intercalation compounds [I I] or metallic superlattices [I21 and others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%