2012
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.85.155129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic structure of Pu and Am metals by self-consistent relativisticGWmethod

Abstract: We present the results of calculations for Pu and Am performed using an implementation of self-consistent relativistic GW method. The key feature of our scheme is to evaluate polarizability and self-energy in real space and Matsubara's time. We compare our GW results with the calculations using local density (LDA) and quasiparticle (QP) approximations and also with scalar-relativistic calculations. By comparing our calculated electronic structures with experimental data, we highlight the importance of both rel… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
133
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
2
133
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3][4][5]) dedicated to investigation of the actinide metals and their compounds. This can be explained not only by their strategic importance, but also by their unusual physical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5]) dedicated to investigation of the actinide metals and their compounds. This can be explained not only by their strategic importance, but also by their unusual physical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 For extended systems, the performance of sc-GW remains controversial due to the scarce number of calculations for real solids. [19][20][21][22] Part of this controversy can be traced back to basis set problems in early all-electron calculations 23 and to the large influence that pseudopotentials may have on GW band gaps. 24 More recently, sc-GW calculations for atoms 25 and molecules 9,17 have shown improvements in the description of the first ionization energies and for transport properties 26 of finite systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19][20][21][22] Part of this controversy can be traced back to basis set problems in early all-electron calculations 23 and to the 075105-1 1098-0121/2013/88(7)/075105(15)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the convenience, we have collected them in Table I (slightly modified Ta racy is poor when one considers spectral properties of solids. 8,27,28 Another conserving sc scheme is scheme B. It uses the same first order vertex Γ 1 in both P and Σ.…”
Section: 20mentioning
confidence: 99%