2010
DOI: 10.1002/sia.3470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic structure of self‐assembled Sm nanostructure on HOPG studied by in‐situ photoemission spectroscopy and scanning probe microscopy

Abstract: In-situ photoemission spectroscopy of Sm over-layer on HOPG in the coverage regime of 0.3∼10.0 Å has been performed at room temperature in the 4d-4f resonance energy region by using monochromatic synchrotron radiation light. Based on analysis of the spectra taken at hν =134 eV (close to divalent samarium resonance), it is indicated that the divalent feature predominates the valence band spectra for the coverage below than 1.0 Å, while the trivalent structures are enhanced for Sm over-layer coverage higher than… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known that in the incident photon energy range of the Sm 4d-4f resonance, the Sm 2+ component mainly originates from the surface layer. Consequently, the Sm 2+ surface state is probed at these photon energies, 36,37 whereas the Sm 3+ component is considered to be from the bulk even at these incident energies. At the surface the Sm atoms are less coordinated; their cohesive energy is therefore lower than that of the bulk Sm atoms, which results in the surface Sm atoms tending to be in the divalent state.…”
Section: Temperature Dependence Of the Electronic Structure Near E Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that in the incident photon energy range of the Sm 4d-4f resonance, the Sm 2+ component mainly originates from the surface layer. Consequently, the Sm 2+ surface state is probed at these photon energies, 36,37 whereas the Sm 3+ component is considered to be from the bulk even at these incident energies. At the surface the Sm atoms are less coordinated; their cohesive energy is therefore lower than that of the bulk Sm atoms, which results in the surface Sm atoms tending to be in the divalent state.…”
Section: Temperature Dependence Of the Electronic Structure Near E Fmentioning
confidence: 99%