2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.88.235110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic structure of SrVO3withinGW+DMFT

Abstract: We present a detailed calculation of the electronic structure of SrVO 3 based on the GW + DMFT method. We show that a proper inclusion of the frequency-dependent Hubbard U and the nonlocal self-energy via the GW approximation, as well as a careful treatment of the Fermi level, are crucial for obtaining an accurate and coherent picture of the quasiparticle band structure and satellite features of SrVO 3 . The GW + DMFT results for SrVO 3 are not attainable within the GW approximation or the LDA + DMFT scheme. W… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

8
66
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
8
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first implementations of GW+DMFT have recently been elaborated, with applications to SrVO 3 [17,18] and to systems of adatoms on surfaces [19]. Nevertheless, since the approach is computationally heavy, an important line of research remains the developing and testing of approx-(a) E-mail: vanroeke@cpht.polytechnique.fr (b) E-mail: biermann@cpht.polytechnique.fr imate schemes, and several different simplified schemes [20][21][22] have recently appeared.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first implementations of GW+DMFT have recently been elaborated, with applications to SrVO 3 [17,18] and to systems of adatoms on surfaces [19]. Nevertheless, since the approach is computationally heavy, an important line of research remains the developing and testing of approx-(a) E-mail: vanroeke@cpht.polytechnique.fr (b) E-mail: biermann@cpht.polytechnique.fr imate schemes, and several different simplified schemes [20][21][22] have recently appeared.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this GW + EDMFT formalism has been tested on simple one-band Hubbard models [14][15][16][17], and several simplified versions have been applied to SrVO 3 [7,10,18,19], a fully self-consistent implementation in an ab initio setting has so far been hampered by the challenges of solving the bosonic selfconsistency loop for multiorbital systems and nontrivial issues related to a proper embedding of the EDMFT calculations into a GW ab initio framework.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constrained random phase approximation (cRPA) [8] provides a systematic way of computing the dynamically screened interaction parameters consistent with the LDA band structure, and the resulting local U (ω) of the DMFT auxiliary system can be efficiently handled by state-of-the-art impurity solvers [9]. These more realistic calculations, however, produce a too strong renormalization of the quasiparticle band [10]. The missing ingredients in the LDA+DMFT + U (ω) approach are the nonlocal self-energy and polarization effects, and the additional screening of the U (ω) resulting from nonlocal Coulomb interactions within the low-energy subspace.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cRPA result and approximating P imp ≈ P GW imp , (3) approximating the double-counting self energy by the local projection of the GW self energy: Σ GW imp ≈ k Σ GW , and (4) solving the DMFT impurity with dynamical U (ω) within the approximative Bose factor Ansatz [109]. In other early works, additional approximations were made: Taranto et al, used a static Hubbard U and circumvented computing a fully frequency-dependent Σ GW [124] (see also below), and Sakuma et al, combined DMFT and GW self energies from independent calculations [125].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%