1994
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.72.3602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic structure of the Abrikosov vortex core in arbitrary magnetic fields

Abstract: Using a scanning tunneling microscope we imaged Abrikosov vortex lattices in 2H-NbSe 2. At a reduced temperature of T/T c =0.6 we found a distinct decrease of the vortex-core radius with increasing magnetic field. Even at low fields H/H c2 << 1, the effect of vortex-vortex interactions on the spatial variation of the order parameter Delta (rho), is clearly evident. In order to interpret the experimental results the microscopic equations of the superconducting state are solved self-consistently. A good quantita… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
46
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
8
46
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter is calculated by summing over relevant neighbors (r i ) using σ 0 (r) = i 1 − tanh((r i − r)/ξ ) (dark dashed line) with ξ = 23 nm. This approximation agrees with microscopic calculations showing that the intervortex density of states for single band superconductors in the dirty limit is practically negligible for fields below about half H c2 [47][48][49]. The magnetic field increase of the intervortex density of states is pronounced, as shown by the blue points in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The latter is calculated by summing over relevant neighbors (r i ) using σ 0 (r) = i 1 − tanh((r i − r)/ξ ) (dark dashed line) with ξ = 23 nm. This approximation agrees with microscopic calculations showing that the intervortex density of states for single band superconductors in the dirty limit is practically negligible for fields below about half H c2 [47][48][49]. The magnetic field increase of the intervortex density of states is pronounced, as shown by the blue points in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…70 Measurements of vortex profiles at different magnetic fields support this idea. 71 Nevertheless, it is not straightforward to relate magnetic-field-induced modifications of core size to the superconducting density of states. 31 Our measurements provide a comparison between zero current and an applied current at the same magnetic field.…”
Section: -3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From both definitions of ξ 1 and ξ 2 (i.e., the initial slope of |∆(r)| and the maximum current), we obtain a similar dependence on H. The shrinkage of the core radius was also reported in STM and µSR experiments. 10,7 There, the results of the field dependence were analyzed in the dirty limit theory by the Wigner-Seitz method (i.e., a circular unit cell is used instead of the periodic boundary condition of the vortex lattice). In our study, we obtain the field dependence in the clean limit, where we treat the periodic boundary condition exactly.…”
Section: B Internal Current Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Muon spin resonance (µSR) 7,8 and small angle neutron scattering (SANS) investigate the internal field distribution of the vortex structure. Scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) [9][10][11][12] directly observes the LDOS. These data are often analyzed within conventional phenomenological theories such as the Ginzburg-Landau (GL) theory or the London theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%