2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.72.035317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic structure of theGaAs(114)A(2×1)andGaAs(

Abstract: Ab initio density functional theory calculations, based on pseudopotentials and the plane wave formalism, have been pursued to examine the equilibrium geometry, bonding and electronic structure of the previously studied GaAs͑114͒A-␣2͑2 ϫ 1͒ surface and in addition a newly proposed GaAs͑114͒B-␣2͑2 ϫ 1͒ surface. Both stoichiometric surfaces are characterized by three prominent surface features ͑dimers, tetramers, and rebonded atoms͒. Several surface states are found in and around the bulk band gap and are interp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The GaP(114)A‐α2(2 × 1)surface is thermodynamically more stable than the GaP(114)B‐α2(2 × 1) surface, as already reported in previous works for the GaAs material. The GaAs(114)A surface energy was found to lie 3 meV Å −2 below the GaAs(114)B . In the interval from Ga‐rich up to Δμ P = −0.70 eV, then from −0.70 eV < Δμ P < −0.16 eV and finally from Δμ P = −0.16 eV to P‐rich conditions, the lowest surface energies are the ones of Ga‐rich GaP(001)md(2 × 4), GaP(114)A‐α2(2 × 1), and P‐rich GaP(001)(2 × 4), respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The GaP(114)A‐α2(2 × 1)surface is thermodynamically more stable than the GaP(114)B‐α2(2 × 1) surface, as already reported in previous works for the GaAs material. The GaAs(114)A surface energy was found to lie 3 meV Å −2 below the GaAs(114)B . In the interval from Ga‐rich up to Δμ P = −0.70 eV, then from −0.70 eV < Δμ P < −0.16 eV and finally from Δμ P = −0.16 eV to P‐rich conditions, the lowest surface energies are the ones of Ga‐rich GaP(001)md(2 × 4), GaP(114)A‐α2(2 × 1), and P‐rich GaP(001)(2 × 4), respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…For the polar GaP(114) surfaces, two types of (2 × 1) reconstructions have been simulated: the Ga‐rich GaP(114)A‐α2(2 × 1) and the P‐rich GaP(114)B‐α2(2 × 1) which are similar to the ones already thoroughly investigated for the GaAs(114) . While simple subtraction methods can be used to compute surface energies of nonpolar surfaces such as the GaP(001) ones, fictitious hydrogen methods have to be used to compute A and B polar surfaces independently with a good accuracy (see the Supporting Information for a detailed surface structures description).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%