2017
DOI: 10.1039/c7tc03003g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic structures and band alignments of monolayer metal trihalide semiconductors MX3

Abstract: Monolayers of metal trihalide MX3 can feasibly be exfoliated from their bulk materials and they have large band gaps.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
35
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparable photoresponse of WSe 2 /BiI 3 and graphene/BiI 3 van der Waals heterostructures have been demonstrated. Previous theoretical studies showed that group V trihalides had suitable bandgap, tunable bandedge and moderated mobility . SbI 3 have high asymmetry structure with bandgap of ≈2.0 eV, and thus it is interesting to investigate the SbI 3 ‐based van der Waals heterostructure for potential optoelectronic and polarization sensitive applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparable photoresponse of WSe 2 /BiI 3 and graphene/BiI 3 van der Waals heterostructures have been demonstrated. Previous theoretical studies showed that group V trihalides had suitable bandgap, tunable bandedge and moderated mobility . SbI 3 have high asymmetry structure with bandgap of ≈2.0 eV, and thus it is interesting to investigate the SbI 3 ‐based van der Waals heterostructure for potential optoelectronic and polarization sensitive applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this theory, the bigger E b is, the more stable the system will be. We find the binding energy is 4.03 eV per atom, which is bigger than the synthetic VI 3 27 and others 28,29 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The total energy difference ΔE per unit surface area is estimated through increasing the distance between layers as shown in Figure 1a, which is defined as ΔE = (E − E 0 )/S. 46,47 Here, E and E 0 are the total energies of the pristine system and the cleaved system, respectively, and S is the surface area of unit cell. The cleavage energy of monolayer Ta 2 CS 2 as displayed in Figure 2a is ∼0.64 J/m 2 , which is slightly larger than that of graphene (0.36 J/m 2 ) and much lower than those of Ti 2 C (1.81 J/m 2 ), Ti 3 C 2 (1.59 J/m 2 ), Ca 2 N (1.09 J/m 2 ), and MnB 2 (5.06 J/m 2 ), indicating that monolayer Ta 2 CS 2 could be reasonably exfoliated from its layered bulk system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%