2015
DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/24/9/097103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic structures and elastic properties of monolayer and bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides MX 2 ( M = Mo, W; X = O, S, Se, Te): A comparative first-principles study

Abstract: When the monolayers are stacked into bilayer, the reduced indirect band gaps are found except for bilayer WTe 2 , in which direct gap is still present at the K point. The calculated in-plane Young moduli are comparable to graphene, which promises the possible application of TMDCs in future flexible and stretchable electronic devices. We also evaluated the performance of different functionals including LDA, PBE, and optB88-vdW in describing elastic moduli of TMDCs and found that LDA seems to be the most qualifi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
32
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
6
32
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Apparently, the calculated band gap is 1.79 eV. This is smaller than the previous theoretical value [ 25 ], which is due to different choices of plane-waves cutoff and k-point grid. It is very easy to observe that the conduction band minimum (CBM) and the valence band maximum (VBM) are at the same high symmetry K point, which indicates that monolayer WS 2 is a direct band gap semiconductor that agrees well with the previous calculation.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…Apparently, the calculated band gap is 1.79 eV. This is smaller than the previous theoretical value [ 25 ], which is due to different choices of plane-waves cutoff and k-point grid. It is very easy to observe that the conduction band minimum (CBM) and the valence band maximum (VBM) are at the same high symmetry K point, which indicates that monolayer WS 2 is a direct band gap semiconductor that agrees well with the previous calculation.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…Our structural optimizations yield lattice constants 4.08 Å for monolayer InSe and 3.19 Å for monolayer WS 2 . The results are listed in Table 1 and they are in good agreement with the values in previous reports [16,27,31,42,43,44,45]. We build the 2D InSe/WS 2 heterostructure in such a way that the lattice mismatch is made as small as possible and the computational cost is still acceptable at the same time.…”
Section: Computational Methods and Modelssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…With the lattice constant of WSe 2 (0.328 nm) 2.5% larger than MoS 2 (0.32 nm), the eigenstrain equals 2.5% suggesting that the inclusion is subject to compression. As their elastic properties have been studied (Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio are 270 GPa and 0.24 for MoS 2 , 251.64 GPa and 0.19 for WSe 2 ), the stress or strain state of the heterostructure could be obtained according to Eshelby inclusion theory. The distribution of stress components σ xx and σ xy is plotted in Figure b,c, and their spatial variation along the middle line (marked with the red dashed line in Figure b,c) is plotted in Figure d, the maximum magnitude of which is about 8 GPa.…”
Section: Resutls and Disscusionmentioning
confidence: 99%