2011
DOI: 10.1038/srep00036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic structures of porous nanocarbons

Abstract: We use large scale ab-initio calculations to describe electronic structures of graphene, graphene nanoribbons, and carbon nanotubes periodically perforated with nanopores. We disclose common features of these systems and develop a unified picture that permits us to analytically predict and systematically characterize metal-semiconductor transitions in nanocarbons with superlattices of nanopores of different sizes and types. These novel materials with highly tunable band structures have numerous potential appli… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
61
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is still a mystery that a periodically modulated graphene can either open up a substantial gap or remain gapless (or a tiny gap) if its supercell lattice changes only slightly1819202122232425262728, which complicates the creation of bandgap by patterning and is apparently at odds with the proposal that bandgap in these graphene structures is due to quantum confinement between neighboring modulated sites16. The quantitative description of quantum confinement that results in energy gap in a patterned graphene is missing; instead, previous theoretical investigations1819202122232425262728 mainly focused on some special patterns whose supercell lattices form rectangular or hexagonal structures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is still a mystery that a periodically modulated graphene can either open up a substantial gap or remain gapless (or a tiny gap) if its supercell lattice changes only slightly1819202122232425262728, which complicates the creation of bandgap by patterning and is apparently at odds with the proposal that bandgap in these graphene structures is due to quantum confinement between neighboring modulated sites16. The quantitative description of quantum confinement that results in energy gap in a patterned graphene is missing; instead, previous theoretical investigations1819202122232425262728 mainly focused on some special patterns whose supercell lattices form rectangular or hexagonal structures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 On a particular note, it was demonstrated that nanopores in graphene can be fabricated with atomic precision by inducing defect nucleation centers with energetic ions, followed by edge-selective electron recoil sputtering. 10 In addition, electronic transport properties of graphene structures with specific edge designs have been studied, 8,11 and site-specific single-atom spectroscopy for direct investigation of the electronic and bonding structures of specific graphene edge atoms with atomic resolution has been carried out. 12 As an important member of the graphene device family, GNPs have been proposed as gas sensors, [13][14][15] selective sieves for ions, 16 and most notably, DNA nucleobases sensing devices promising fast and low-cost DNA sequencing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike traditional quantum wells, the boundary conditions of GNRs are complicated functions of position and momentum resulting from the dual sublattice symmetry of graphene, giving rise to a unique band structure. Because of this, the shape of the boundary as well as the presence of nanopores profoundly affects the electronic states of GNRs (27)(28)(29)(30), for example, leading to a difference in band structure for zigzag and armchair-edged GNRs (31).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%