2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2010.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic tongue for simultaneous detection of endotoxins and other contaminants of microbiological origin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The electrochemical approach based on sensors or biosensors stands out among all of them. Most of these studies rely on electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) for the LPS detection (Cho et al, 2012;Ding et al, 2007;Heras et al, 2010;Rahman et al, 2013). For instance, the sensors developed by Ding and his co-workers and Rahman and its group use EIS to quantify the amount of LPS through immobilized PmB (polymyxin B).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electrochemical approach based on sensors or biosensors stands out among all of them. Most of these studies rely on electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) for the LPS detection (Cho et al, 2012;Ding et al, 2007;Heras et al, 2010;Rahman et al, 2013). For instance, the sensors developed by Ding and his co-workers and Rahman and its group use EIS to quantify the amount of LPS through immobilized PmB (polymyxin B).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Affinity interactions had first been shown to result in conductivity increase. This effect allows discriminating between specific and unspecific processes in contrast to majority of impedimetric affinity sensors based on conductivity decrease as an analytical response .…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endotoxins are responsible for the toxic effects that cause fevers, 1 septic shock, 2 and sepsis. 3,4 Biosensor based endotoxin detection has been widely investigated recently, 5,6 and many methods have been investigated to identify endotoxins: hydrophobic interactions, 7 localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR), 8 mass spectrometry, 9 optical methods, 10 the electronic tongue, 11 the voltammetric method, 12 and electrochemistry. [13][14][15][16][17] However, these methods have some disadvantages, such as high costs, a long processing time and the requirement of labeled markers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%