2015
DOI: 10.1016/bs.aamop.2015.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic Transport as a Driver for Self-Interaction-Corrected Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that in Eqs. ( 9) and (11) we use the fact that the number of electrons of the states in the brackets differs by one. For increasing N imp +N b the total number of excited states M N0±1 becomes exponentially large.…”
Section: A Dynamical Mean Field Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Note that in Eqs. ( 9) and (11) we use the fact that the number of electrons of the states in the brackets differs by one. For increasing N imp +N b the total number of excited states M N0±1 becomes exponentially large.…”
Section: A Dynamical Mean Field Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our quantum algorithm we determine G α (ω) with calculations on a quantum computer, which means that we evaluate the quantities in Eqs. (8)(9)(10)(11) on a quantum device. The remaining computations of the DMFT calculation are performed on a classical computer (Fig.…”
Section: A Dynamical Mean Field Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DFT methods with a large self-interaction error (local approximations and GGA, for a complete discussion of the influence of this error on tranport calculations see ref. [27]) will result in small energy gaps between empty and occupied orbitals, thus, giving wrong transmission curves and conductance values that are often too large. This can be improved by using more sophisticate functionals that partially remove such error (for instance, hybrid or long-range corrected functionals).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shortly thereafter, the Wisconsin SIC group [33][34][35] suggested the use of localization-equations as a variational means for addressing the unitary non-invariance that existed in the original formulation. This approach has been the primary means for variational self-interaction corrections as discussed in recent reviews [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43]. While the original version of SIC [33][34][35] only considered real orbitals, several researchers [40,44,45] have noted that there is no a priori reason to expect that complex orbitals could not lead to lower SIC energies and have derived additional formulae for their minimization.…”
Section: Fermi-löwdin Orbitals For Unitarily Invariant Sicmentioning
confidence: 99%