2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2010.05.077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic transport in an anisotropic Sierpinski gasket

Abstract: We present exact results on certain electronic properties of an anisotropic Sierpinski gasket fractal. We use a tight binding Hamiltonian and work within the formalism of a real space renormalization group (RSRG) method. The anisotropy is introduced in the values of the nearest neighbor hopping integrals. An extensive numerical examination of the two terminal transmission spectrum and the flow of the hopping integrals under the RSRG iterations strongly suggest that an anisotropic gasket is more conducting than… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The magnitude of the conductivity however, is sensitive to the strength of the hopping parameters. This fact has also been reported recently for non-interacting electrons [36].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The magnitude of the conductivity however, is sensitive to the strength of the hopping parameters. This fact has also been reported recently for non-interacting electrons [36].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The magnitude of D at any specific U of course, depends on the numerical values of the hopping strength. Interestingly, this fact is also observed [36] for non-interacting electrons on an SPG. In the half-filled band case, the Drude weight exhibits a much sharper drop in its value compared to the non-half-filled situation.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…i |i the corresponding eigenstate, where |i is the totally localized state at vertex i. The inverse participation ratios (IPR) of a state Φ (t) is defined as ξ = 1/ i (φ 4 . If we allow Φ (t) to be unnormalized, ξ is redefined as…”
Section: Tight Binding Models On Gmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most physical systems living on heterogenous structure behaves quite different from those living on homogeneous backgrounds with translational invariance and other symmetries, as exemplified by the analysis of several quantum models in the past few decades [1][2][3][4][5][6]. The anomalies include, for instance, the multifractal properties of the energy spectrum, the low-dimensional Bose-Einstein condensation, and the log-periodic oscillation of thermodynamic properties [7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%