2017
DOI: 10.1080/15332691.2016.1238798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic Visibility Management of Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identities and Relationships in Young Adulthood

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Exploration of Hypotheses 3a and 3b provided predominantly significant results, with non-exclusively heterosexual respondents having sent more sexts overall, thereby confirming Hypothesis 3a, and consistent with prior findings from Bianchi et al (2016Bianchi et al ( , 2019 and Currin and Hubach (2019). These results are in line with the concept of visibility management (Chong et al, 2015;Hertlein et al, 2015;Twist et al, 2017), which proposes that non-exclusively heterosexual individuals would be more comfortable initiating contact online within self-selected and perceived safe communities. Furthermore, the relationship between sexual orientation and the frequency of sending sexts was moderated by body image self-consciousness, as suggested by Hypothesis 3b.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Exploration of Hypotheses 3a and 3b provided predominantly significant results, with non-exclusively heterosexual respondents having sent more sexts overall, thereby confirming Hypothesis 3a, and consistent with prior findings from Bianchi et al (2016Bianchi et al ( , 2019 and Currin and Hubach (2019). These results are in line with the concept of visibility management (Chong et al, 2015;Hertlein et al, 2015;Twist et al, 2017), which proposes that non-exclusively heterosexual individuals would be more comfortable initiating contact online within self-selected and perceived safe communities. Furthermore, the relationship between sexual orientation and the frequency of sending sexts was moderated by body image self-consciousness, as suggested by Hypothesis 3b.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…A number of reasons for the increased proclivity towards sexting within non-exclusively heterosexual orientation groups have been suggested. These include visibility management (Hertlein et al, 2015; Twist et al, 2017) whereby individuals can choose to whom they present their sexual orientation and preference, and can expand potential social and relationship circles beyond those personally known to them from face-to-face interactions. In addition, using orientation-specific relationship mobile applications to initiate contact can facilitate relationships and may be protective against stigma and discrimination (Chong et al, 2015; Hertlein et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 As a marginalized group, bisexual youth may find greater autonomy and affordances in their experience when they utilize the Internet to obtain health information and search for friends who accept their sexual identity. 9,11,16 At the same time, engaging in problematic cyber behaviors (e.g., misuse of social networking sites) may also expose bisexual youth to greater risks of cyberbullying victimization 17 or other risk behaviors, 21 which may contribute to worse mental and physical health outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is unclear if sexual minority adolescents engage more frequently in cyber behaviors than heterosexual adolescents. This is a critical literature gap as increased cyber behaviors may expose youth to online safety risks such as cyberbullying, 9 a key contributor to depressive symptoms. 10 The present study examined the extent to which adolescents who report nonheterosexual attraction engage in more frequent cyber behaviors during young adulthood, whether sexual orientation subgroup differences extend to mental and physical health indicators, and if cyber behaviors mediate the association between bisexual attraction and health indicators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others’ assumptions in this regard left some SM people unprepared for disclosure or not wanting to disclose in particular situations or places (Lu et al, 2019). For instance, among 61 young SM adults (44.7% POC), most (67.1%) reported disclosing their relationship status through social media, with the majority stating that said disclosure did not negatively impact their relationship satisfaction (Twist et al, 2017). Although half of the sample for this study consisted of SMPOC, racial and ethnic identities were not explored, leaving many questions unanswered regarding how racial, ethnic, and cultural identities play a role in this disclosure, especially via social media.…”
Section: State Of Empirical Research On Smpoc and Relationship Functi...mentioning
confidence: 99%