“…There are several traditional analytical methods reported for the quantification of CPs in the environmental samples, for example, gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, high performance-liquid chromatography, and capillary electrophoresis. , Surely, these analytical methods offer influential trace analysis and can detect CPs at very low concentration levels. However, there are certain serious factors that limit the practices of these analytical tools, as these techniques require tedious sample treatment, extensive purification, expensive equipment, and demand well-qualified personnel. , In contrast, the electroanalytical methods got a clear edge over the conventional analytical methods in terms of high sensitivity, fast response, low cost, miniaturization, and most importantly, in-situ analysis. − Until now, different electrochemical sensors have been reported for the detection of 2,4,6 TCP such as HS-β-cyclodextrin, graphene-bromocresol purple, composite sensor based on rhodamine B/platinum nanoparticles/carbon nanotubes, film composite of Ni(OH) 2 –Co(OH) 2 , and SWCNTs/poly-3,4-ethylenedioxothiophen . However, the electrochemical activity of 2,4,6 TCP is very weak, and it requires a large amount of activation energy that results in poor sensitivity. , …”