Dihydropyridines of type 2 substituted at the C4-position by a carboxylic acid are valuable intermediates for the synthesis of new heterocyclic compounds, including tetrahydropyridinefused d-lactones 3, polysubstituted tetrahydropyridines 4, and piperidine-fused d-lactones 5 (Scheme 1).[1]The starting materials for all those transformations were differently substituted pyridines, which underwent stepwise nucleophilic addition reactions with ketene acetals 1 upon activation by methyl chloroformate. The ring-closure reaction, leading from 2 to 3, is stereospecific: only the transdiaxial-oriented functionalized lactones are formed. These transformations are part of a special class of reactions of dihydropyridines: nonbiomimetic oxidations, which do not lead, as one would expect, to pyridinium salts.[2] Indeed, the electrophiles preferentially react with one of the double bonds of the ene-carbamates 2 than with the proton at C4.The activation of the pyridinium nucleus towards carbon nucleophiles is not limited to alkyl chloroformates or acid chlorides, since several research groups have also used triflic anhydride for that purpose; in addition to the higher stability of the intermediate pyridinium salts and the general higher yields of the addition products, the absence of rotamers at room temperature is also beneficial.[3] For the purpose of comparing the two activation procedures, with methyl chloroformate or triflic anhydride, we synthesized a series of dihydropyridines subsituted by a triflyl group on the nitrogen atom. This led us to the discovery of a new, unexpected transformation of these dihydropyridines.Thus, the reaction of pyridine with ketene acetals 1 a,b (1 equiv) and then with triflic anhydride (1 equiv) at À30 8C led, as expected, after warming the mixture to room temperature and stirring for 17 h, to the same type of acid-substituted dihydropyridines 7 a,b in high yield (97 %, Scheme 2). Although the reaction of these dihydropyridines with either silica gel or an anhydrous solution of HCl in diethyl ether did not lead to the expected lactones 8 a,b, they did react with I 2 and CuBr 2 to give, as for 2, the corresponding halolactones 9 (Scheme 3). [1,4] However, further studies allowed us to discover a new transformation of these dihydropyridines. Indeed, it appeared that the yield of the dihydropyridines 7 a,b was dependent both on the reaction conditions (order of addition, time of reaction) and on the amount of triflic anhydride used with respect to the starting pyridine: no such an influence was observed when methyl chloroformate was used as the activating agent. The use of an excess of triflic anhydride, however, led to the yield of the dihydropyridines decreasing as a function of time. Surprisingly, according to TLC analysis, Scheme 1. Transformations of dihydropyridines.Scheme 2. Preparation of 7.Scheme 3. Formation of lactone 9.