1964
DOI: 10.1021/ac60211a007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrophoresis

Abstract: The title of this review has been changed from "Electrochromatography" to "Electrophoresis" because a survey of the literature shows an overwhelming preference for the latter term. This preference seems logical because the resemblance between electrophoresis and chromatography is mainly superficial, being related to the accidental similarity of the patterns formed by the separated materials rather than to the fundamental principles underlying the separations. The term electrochromatography is also undesirable … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1965
1965
1966
1966

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 184 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This review refers to a few articles that were published in 1960, 1961, and 1962, but most citations date from the second half of 1963 through the early part of 1965; it continues the coverage of a previous review (2137). Once again in the bibliography, the Chemical Abstracts reference numbers have been appended wherever the article mentioned has appeared in a publication that is not readily accessible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This review refers to a few articles that were published in 1960, 1961, and 1962, but most citations date from the second half of 1963 through the early part of 1965; it continues the coverage of a previous review (2137). Once again in the bibliography, the Chemical Abstracts reference numbers have been appended wherever the article mentioned has appeared in a publication that is not readily accessible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%