2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:jmsc.0000012905.62256.39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrophoretic deposition for coatings and free standing objects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The physical foundation for neglecting this factor in the case of PC solutions is developed below, however we first note that, with this choice, the agreement between predicted behavior and real measurements was quite good (compare solid lines and data points in Figure 4b). A possible explanation to this surprisingly simple model was proposed by Van der Biest et al, 50 who described various resistances encountered during EPD in terms of an equivalent electric circuit generated by different contributions. When a deposit is growing from particles suspended in a colloidal suspension, the overall resistance can be depicted dividing the system in two regions, suspension and deposit, ideally connected in series.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physical foundation for neglecting this factor in the case of PC solutions is developed below, however we first note that, with this choice, the agreement between predicted behavior and real measurements was quite good (compare solid lines and data points in Figure 4b). A possible explanation to this surprisingly simple model was proposed by Van der Biest et al, 50 who described various resistances encountered during EPD in terms of an equivalent electric circuit generated by different contributions. When a deposit is growing from particles suspended in a colloidal suspension, the overall resistance can be depicted dividing the system in two regions, suspension and deposit, ideally connected in series.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anne et al reported on a current drop caused by the increased resistance of the formed deposit, which can be explained by increasing the thickness of the deposited powder bed, by the formation of an ion-depletion layer (Van Tassel and Randall, 2007), mass transport limitations (Koura et al, 1995), etc. As discussed by Van der Biest (Van der Biest et al, 2004) the resistivity of the deposit is a combination of the powder bed and the resistivity of the interparticle electrolyte liquid. In the case of the electrophoretic deposition of PEEK in an aqueous medium, the resistance of the deposit appeared to be very dependent on the migration of ions and electrochemical reactions occurring at the electrodes (water decomposition, reduction of Na + ), which influenced the conductivity of the electrolyte within the deposit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electrophoretic deposition (EPD) is an effective technique that allows theshapingoffree standing objects, and also to deposit thick films on substrates starting from liquid suspensions of ceramic powders and by application of direct current (DC) potentials. This method employs the phenomenon of the movement of colloidal particles suspended in a medium when subjected to an electric field 9,10 . Recent investigations have been undertaken on the electrophoretic deposition of barium titanate films [11][12][13][14] , however, only few of theseone were successful in obtaining dense ceramic films with a uniform microstructure and morphology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%