The decision to attempt hearing preservation during acoustic neuroma (AN) surgery has a dramatic impact on the choice of surgical approach. The translabyrinthine route, which has been in use for many years by otoneurosurgeons, has helped to reduce the mortality and morbidity rates. According to many authors, this is the technique of choice in subjects with poor preoperative hearing function, that is, greater than 50 dB or 70 dB in pure-tone average (PTA) and/or less than 70% or 50% in speech discrimination score (SDS).'-5 In patients with serviceable hearing, the retrosigmoid or middle fossa routes are preferred. '-5 Our group is intensely involved in functional otosurgical procedures and particularly in hearing preservation during AN surgery. To this end we selected the retrosigmoid-transmeatal approach, as it presents a series of advantages such as adequate control of bleeding in the cerebellopontine angle (CPA) and the possibility of monitoring hearing function by means of direct recording of cochlear nerve action potentials (CNAPs).5-0 TWhis method of monitoring is particularly suitable for investigating the mechanisms of auditory damage in AN and during AN surgery. The derived potentials are of large amplitude and are easily visualized on an oscilloscope either directly or after averaging a few responses. They provide rapid information on the function of the cochlear nerve (CN) and the cochlea. They also furnish a unique opportunity to investigate auditory physiology and pathophysiology in humans.11-13During surgery of the posterior fossa, CNAPs have proven to be sensitive in detecting damage to the periph-153