1993
DOI: 10.3109/00016489309135895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrophysiologic Identification of the Cochlear Nerve Fibers during Cerebellopontine Angle Surgery

Abstract: To facilitate identification and preservation of the auditory nerve during cerebello-pontine angle surgery, bipolar recording of cochlear nerve compound action potentials (CNAPs) was performed. Two silver wires insulated with teflon up to the exposed ends were utilized as electrodes. They were twisted together, the distance between the two tips being 1 mm or less. Rarefaction polarity clicks (31/s) ranging from the psychoacoustical threshold to 120 dB pe SPL were used as stimuli. The investigation was performe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore the surgeon cannot be sure which manipulation during the tumour dissection has caused the loss of BAEPs. The direct monitoring of the cochlear nerve (CNAP) may warn the surgeon earlier [7,42]. But it is not able to explain, which manipulation really had caused the worsening of the potentials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore the surgeon cannot be sure which manipulation during the tumour dissection has caused the loss of BAEPs. The direct monitoring of the cochlear nerve (CNAP) may warn the surgeon earlier [7,42]. But it is not able to explain, which manipulation really had caused the worsening of the potentials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A particular feature of the RS-TM approach is the unique possibility it affords of performing real-time intraoperative monitoring by means of direct recording of CNAPs and FNAPs. [14][15][16][17][18][19] Instantaneous information on the function of the cochlea and the cochlear and facial nerves is obtained with these techniques, and insights into the mechanisms of hearing and facial nerve impairment are therefore available during surgery. [14][15][16][17][18][19] The information provided by intraoperative monitoring has thus helped refine surgical techniques directed toward the preservation of cranial nerve function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otoacoustic emissions and electrocochleography (EcoG) were used in the early stages but were soon abandoned because of poor reliability in the results obtained with these techniques. 8 The intraoperative auditory monitoring technique has been reported in previous articles [14][15][16][17][18] and will be only briefly outlined here. The ear undergoing the operation is stimulated by rarefaction click stimuli at 31/s, generated by applying 100-micron rectangular electric pulses through a lightweight set of earphones (such as those used with portable cassette players or radios).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proper identification and respect for CN and vascular structures, preservation of the inner ear, and early detection of cochlear and/or neural damage are the prerequisites for hearing preservation. 4,10,11,[15][16][17][18][19][20] Auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) have been utilized in AN surgery to establish correlations between surgical maneuvers and damage to cochlear structures and postoperative hearing, the aim being to identify and avoid dangerous surgical maneuvers.21-24 ABRs, however, require a considerable length of time (at least 1 to 2 min) for reliable responses to be obtained and interpreted. To analyze each individual maneuver in a more specific and detailed way, enabling the surgeon to correlate causes and effects of damage, a real-time recording technique is needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%