2009
DOI: 10.1007/bf03395659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrophysiological Activity Generated During the Implicit Association Test: A Study Using Event-Related Potentials

Abstract: The Implicit Association Test (IAT)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On congruent blocks, ERP amplitudes were more positive in frontal, occipital and parietal regions at early intervals compared to incongruent blocks, which is consistent with past findings employing similar designs (Banfield et al, 2006; Barnes-Holmes et al, 2008; O'Toole and Barnes-Holmes, 2009; Coates, 2011; Williams and Themanson, 2011). The differences found here were at earlier time intervals then the aforementioned studies, however, which could have been due to discrepancies in how trials were paced in the respective studies or the use of feedback in the IAT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On congruent blocks, ERP amplitudes were more positive in frontal, occipital and parietal regions at early intervals compared to incongruent blocks, which is consistent with past findings employing similar designs (Banfield et al, 2006; Barnes-Holmes et al, 2008; O'Toole and Barnes-Holmes, 2009; Coates, 2011; Williams and Themanson, 2011). The differences found here were at earlier time intervals then the aforementioned studies, however, which could have been due to discrepancies in how trials were paced in the respective studies or the use of feedback in the IAT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Nevertheless, findings indicate that ERPs are sensitive to IAT task conditions. O'Toole and Barnes-Holmes (2009) recorded ERPs during an IAT and found that congruent trials elicited significantly more positive ERPs in comparison with incongruent trials in the 300–600 ms latency range at parietal and central sites. Assessing ERPs along the midline only, Williams and Themanson (2011) recorded EEG activity while individuals completed a Gay-Straight IAT (Gay and Straight relationships were indicated by pictures, while good and bad attributes were indicated by words).…”
Section: Temporal and Spatial Neural Contributions To The Iatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). Similarly, earlier IAT studies in healthy subjects also reported larger LPP amplitudes in congruent trails (Hurtado et al, 2009;O'Toole and Barnes-Holmes, 2009;Williams and Themanson, 2011), which was interpreted as stronger emotional activation in congruent than incongruent trials. The LPP enhancement in microstate 8 in controls (in contrast to patients) might therefore be indicative of enhanced emotional processing during this timeframe.…”
Section: Neurophysiology Of Implicit Alcohol Associations In Audsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The time course of the ERP we observed in our task is generally similar to that found in previous studies investigating IAT paradigms by using ingroup/outgroup face stimuli (Hurtado et al, 2009) as well as homo-and heterosexual couple images (Williams & Themanson, 2011), particularly in terms of the presence of robust congruent/incongruent differences in a late time window. The results relating to early ERP differences are more variable (Ibáñez et al, 2010;O'Tolle & Barnes-Holmes, 2009). For example, one study has reported differences as early as 170 ms post-stimulusonset that were likely due to the discrimination of configuration aspects of the stimuli (ingroup/outgroup faces and valence) used in this study (Ibáñez et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%