2019
DOI: 10.1101/746164
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrophysiological correlates of the flexible allocation of visual working memory resources

Abstract: 1Visual working memory is a brief, capacity-limited store of visual information that is involved in 2 a large number of cognitive functions. To guide one's behavior effectively, one must efficiently 3 allocate these limited memory resources across memory items. Previous research has suggested 4 that items are either stored in memory or completely blocked from memory access. However, 5 recent behavioral work proposes that memory resources can be flexibly split across items based 6 on their level of task importa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, there is evidence that unnecessary storage does not predict VWM performance as well as the preceding attentional control-related brain activity (Emrich & Busseri, 2015). In addition, several studies have found that a strict all-or-none memory filter (wherein all targets are let into memory and all distractors are denied access) is not sufficient to describe memory performance (Dube et al, 2017;Emrich et al, 2017;Salahub et al, 2019). The ability to flexibly allocate memory resources amongst items may be related to attentional control, a likely candidate for the underlying mechanism driving the relationship between anxiety and the mis-allocation of VWM resources observed in prior studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, there is evidence that unnecessary storage does not predict VWM performance as well as the preceding attentional control-related brain activity (Emrich & Busseri, 2015). In addition, several studies have found that a strict all-or-none memory filter (wherein all targets are let into memory and all distractors are denied access) is not sufficient to describe memory performance (Dube et al, 2017;Emrich et al, 2017;Salahub et al, 2019). The ability to flexibly allocate memory resources amongst items may be related to attentional control, a likely candidate for the underlying mechanism driving the relationship between anxiety and the mis-allocation of VWM resources observed in prior studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we hypothesized that although there are object benefits even in studies with simultaneous presentations of a large number of items (i.e., Brady & Störmer, 2020), such conditions may nevertheless be among the most favorable conditions for simple stimuli and least favorable for realistic meaningful stimuli. In real-world scenarios where participants use visual working memory to perform tasks (e.g., holding in mind the target of an eye movement: Hollingworth et al 2008; or the target of an action: Ballard et al 1995;Hayhoe et al 2003), they are relatively unlikely to try to equally encode many stimuli at once, and instead to focus additional resources on more task-relevant stimuli (e.g., Salahub et al 2019) and encode stimuli sequentially (e.g., Ballard et al 1995).…”
Section: Experiments 1: How Does the Memory Benefit For Objects Relatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The CDA was so-named by Vogel and Machizawa (2004) because it was found contralateral to task-relevant stimuli during the delay period of a memory task. However, as pointed out by Luria et al, (2016), the CDA has also been labelled the sustained posterior contralateral negativity (SPCN; , or the contralateral search activity (CSA; Emrich et al, 2019) to reflect the fact that this component can be elicited during tasks without a working memory delay period. While it remains unclear whether all observations of contralateral activity discussed here reflect a single phenomenon, for simplicity and consistency with the literature, we will use the umbrella term CDA to refer to lateralized delay activity elicited in visual tasks, and tactile CDA (or tCDA) when referring to tactile experiments.…”
Section: Contralateral Delay Activity In Vision and Touchmentioning
confidence: 99%