2000
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrophysiological effects of endothelin‐1 and their relationship to contraction in rat renal arterial smooth muscle

Abstract: 1 The electophysiological e ects of endothelin-1 (ET-1) and their relationship to contraction remain unclear in the renal circulation. Using endothelium-denuded arteries from the main branch of the renal artery proximal to the kidney of the rat, we have examined its e ects on tension and conducted parallel patch-clamp measurements using freshly isolated smooth muscle cells from this tissue.2 Pharmacological experiments revealed that ET-1 produced constriction of renal arteries dependent on the in¯ux of extrace… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is essentially consistent with previous reports in vivo and in vitro in that the nifedipine partially reverses the renal vasoconstrictor effect of ET-1 [30,40]. Furthermore, it has been reported in the renal artery that ET-1 induces membrane depolarization, and this effect is likely to favor L-type Ca 2+ activity, allowing Ca 2+ influx necessary for contraction [41]. However, several researchers have shown that the contraction induced by ET-1 is resistant to nifedipine [42][43][44][45].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This result is essentially consistent with previous reports in vivo and in vitro in that the nifedipine partially reverses the renal vasoconstrictor effect of ET-1 [30,40]. Furthermore, it has been reported in the renal artery that ET-1 induces membrane depolarization, and this effect is likely to favor L-type Ca 2+ activity, allowing Ca 2+ influx necessary for contraction [41]. However, several researchers have shown that the contraction induced by ET-1 is resistant to nifedipine [42][43][44][45].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…One possible reason for this discrepancy in the K ϩ ionic dependency of adipocyte Vm, is that in our study isolated adipocytes were clearly identified as such, whereas in previous studies of the ionic dependency of Vm sharp electrodes were impaled blindly into white fat explants, where it was assumed that Vm was recorded from adipocytes. This is a pertinent point, since only a narrow band of cytoplasm circumnavigates the lipid droplet (11,49), whereas other cells of the adipose tissue, such as smooth muscle and endothelia of its vasculature, being larger, have a higher likelihood of actual impalement and have Vm values quite similar to those reported for identified adipocytes; for example, the resting membrane potential of smooth muscle myocytes from a variety of arterial tissues range from Ϫ32 mV in pulmonary (3) to Ϫ39 mV in renal (8), whereas the resting Vm for endothelial cells range from Ϫ26 mV from pulmonary artery (52) to Ϫ43 mV from aorta (9). Another possible reason for this discrepancy is that in previously published work (6), although not explicitly given, the A: Vm measured using the perforated patch clamp technique for a primary adipocyte in response to equimolar substitution of 138 mM bath Cl Ϫ with I Ϫ .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Likewise, there was no evidence for ET B receptors in rat pulmonary artery because sarafotoxin 6c failed to induce vasoconstriction [3]. In enzymatically dispersed VSMC from rat renal artery, the ET B antagonist BQ-788 failed to affect the action of ET-1 in voltage-clamp experiments [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%