2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2015.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrophysiological evidence for the effects of unitization on associative recognition memory in older adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
57
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
6
57
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The beneficial effects of the experimentally induced unitization on older adults' source memory were accompanied by an enhanced familiarity-related mid-frontal old/new effect for the older adults. Along with previous studies that manipulated the unitization with pre-experimental unitized associations (Ahmad et al, 2015;Zheng et al, 2015b), these findings provide converging evidence for the promotional effects of unitization on the associative memory in older adults.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The beneficial effects of the experimentally induced unitization on older adults' source memory were accompanied by an enhanced familiarity-related mid-frontal old/new effect for the older adults. Along with previous studies that manipulated the unitization with pre-experimental unitized associations (Ahmad et al, 2015;Zheng et al, 2015b), these findings provide converging evidence for the promotional effects of unitization on the associative memory in older adults.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Both studies found that older adults exhibited better associative recognition on the compound word pairs relative to the unrelated words pairs. In addition, the older adults showed an enhanced familiarity-based retrieval in the unitized word pair condition (Zheng et al, 2015b), suggesting there are beneficial effects of the familiarity processes on the associative memory performance in older adults for pre-existing associations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared to pleasant and neutral contexts, objects embedded in unpleasant background scenes generated enhanced frontal ERP old/new differences between 300 and 500 ms. A number of studies propose that relational memory depends upon recollection-based mechanisms (Rugg & Curran, 2007;Wilding & Rugg, 1996). However, recent behavioral (Diana, Yonelinas, & Ranganath, 2008, 2010 and electrophysiological studies (Addante, Raganath, & Yonelinas, 2012;Diana, Van den Boom, Yonelinas, & Ranganath, 2011;Ecker, Zimmer, & GrohBordin, 2007a, b;Mollison & Curran, 2012;Peters & Daum, 2009;Speer & Curran, 2007;Tibon, Ben-Zvi, & Levy, 2014;Tibon, Gronau, Scheuplein, Mecklinger, & Levy, 2014;Tibon & Levy, 2014;Tsivilis et al, 2001;Zheng, Li, Xiao, Broster, & Jiang, 2015) have found that familiarity-related processes could also contribute to source recognition (Johnson, Hashtroudi, & Lindsay, 1993;Yonelinas, 2002). In an attempt to shed light on the familiarrelated processes embedded in source memory, Diana et al (2008Diana et al ( , 2010Diana et al, 2011) investigated the impact of encoding processes on familiarity-based recognition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same direction, a number of studies have observed that when item-source associations can be processed together at encoding, familiarity processes are also enhanced during recognition. Thus, when item and source information are encoded in the same modality (visual) vs. different modality (visual and auditory;Tibon, Ben-Zvi, et al, 2014;Tibon, Gronau, et al, 2014;Tibon & Levy, 2014), when the nature of the association item-source is intrinsic versus extrinsic (Ecker et al, 2007a, b;Zheng et al, 2015), or when source refers to salient contextual information (Mollison & Curran, 2012), source recognition prompts larger familiarity-related ERPs, suggesting that memory for source information is strengthened (Addante et al, 2012;Chiu et al, 2013;Curran, 2004). In the present study, no explicit instructions for unitization were given; however, as commented above, we promoted item-context binding processes at encoding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%