“…Nontarget objects which are physically dissimilar but semantically linked to current targets can attract attention during visual search (e.g., Moores, Laiti, & Chelazzi, 2003;Belke, Humphreys, Watson, Meyer, & Telling, 2008; see also Telling, Kumar, Meyer, & Humphreys, 2010, for ERP evidence). Along similar lines, images of real-world visual objects that match the current search target category can capture attention even when they are presented at task-irrelevant locations (Wyble, Folk, & Potter, 2013), indicating that information about object categories can be 23 encoded rapidly and can affect the deployment of attention in a task-set contingent fashion (see also Castelhano, Pollatsek, &Cave, 2008, andMaxfield, Stadler, &Zelinsky, 2014, for evidence that the typicality of target objects in terms of their category can affect visual search performance).…”