2010
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrophysiological Evidence of Semantic Interference in Visual Search

Abstract: Abstract■ Visual evoked responses were monitored while participants searched for a target (e.g., bird ) in a four-object display that could include a semantically related distractor (e.g., fish). The occurrence of both the target and the semantically related distractor modulated the N2pc response to the search display: The N2pc amplitude was more pronounced when the target and the distractor appeared in the same visual field, and it was less pronounced when the target and the distractor were in opposite fields… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
56
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
7
56
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Converging evidence comes from studies using eventrelated potentials (ERPs), which highlight how rapidly particular effects arise. Telling et al [5] used the same paradigm as Moores et al [4] and measured ERPs. They documented effects of semantic distractors on the so-called N2pc component.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Converging evidence comes from studies using eventrelated potentials (ERPs), which highlight how rapidly particular effects arise. Telling et al [5] used the same paradigm as Moores et al [4] and measured ERPs. They documented effects of semantic distractors on the so-called N2pc component.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Targets are identified more effectively when they appear within repeated spatial configurations of distractors compared with novel contexts. Electrophysiological recordings during contextual cueing experiments have revealed modulation of targetselection mechanisms (Johnson et al, 2007;Chaumon et al, 2008Chaumon et al, , 2009Schubö, 2009, 2010;Telling et al, 2010), although findings have not been entirely consistent and studies have not always controlled adequately for eye movements. Furthermore, because the target appears embedded within distractors, it is not possible to test for perceptual modulations unambiguously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nontarget objects which are physically dissimilar but semantically linked to current targets can attract attention during visual search (e.g., Moores, Laiti, & Chelazzi, 2003;Belke, Humphreys, Watson, Meyer, & Telling, 2008; see also Telling, Kumar, Meyer, & Humphreys, 2010, for ERP evidence). Along similar lines, images of real-world visual objects that match the current search target category can capture attention even when they are presented at task-irrelevant locations (Wyble, Folk, & Potter, 2013), indicating that information about object categories can be 23 encoded rapidly and can affect the deployment of attention in a task-set contingent fashion (see also Castelhano, Pollatsek, &Cave, 2008, andMaxfield, Stadler, &Zelinsky, 2014, for evidence that the typicality of target objects in terms of their category can affect visual search performance).…”
Section: Discussion Of Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%