2011
DOI: 10.1002/hup.1231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrophysiological indices of altered working memory processes in long‐term ecstasy users

Abstract: Ecstasy users' performance was suppressed more by the concurrent processing demands of the working memory task than that of the non-ecstasy-using controls. Non-ecstasy-using controls showed differential event-related potential wave forms in the short-term and working memory tasks, and this pattern was not seen in the ecstasy users. This is consistent with a reduction in the cognitive resources allocated to processing in working memory in ecstasy users.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding of ecstasy users showing a durable abnormality in this ERP component exemplifies how EEG is a much more sensitive measure of cognitive impairment than behavioural measures alone. This point is further elucidated by Nulsen et al (2011) wherein ecstasy users displayed alternative patterns of activity in ERPs compared to drug naïve and polydrug controls in short term and working memory tasks, despite no significant behavioural differences.…”
Section: Eeg Studies In Ecstasy Usersmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The finding of ecstasy users showing a durable abnormality in this ERP component exemplifies how EEG is a much more sensitive measure of cognitive impairment than behavioural measures alone. This point is further elucidated by Nulsen et al (2011) wherein ecstasy users displayed alternative patterns of activity in ERPs compared to drug naïve and polydrug controls in short term and working memory tasks, despite no significant behavioural differences.…”
Section: Eeg Studies In Ecstasy Usersmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The remaining n = 11 (35%) brain imaging studies in our systematic review reported worse WM performance in SUD compared to controls and altered neural processes ( Bava et al, 2010 ; Moeller et al, 2010 ; Smith et al, 2010 ; Nulsen et al, 2011 ; Cservenka et al, 2012 ; Marvel et al, 2012 ; Fitzpatrick and Crowe, 2013 ; Ozsoy et al, 2013 ; Falcone et al, 2014 ; Claus and Hendershot, 2015 ; Liang et al, 2016 ). In conjunction with worse WM performance, structural studies demonstrated reduced fractional anisotropy (FA) in PFC WM networks and higher FA in visual networks that may be linked to cognitive biases in alcohol and marijuana-using adolescents ( Bava et al, 2010 ).…”
Section: Substance Use Disorders Working Memory and Cognitive Controlmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Several recent evoked response potential studies have shown an association between the task performance deficits of abstinent Ecstasy/MDMA users and altered patterns of brain activity (Roberts et al ., ; Burgess et al ., ; Nulsen et al ., ). In a large neuroimaging study, Kish et al .…”
Section: New Psychobiological Deficitsmentioning
confidence: 97%