1974
DOI: 10.1007/bf00237904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrophysiological properties of lateral reticular nucleus cells: II. Synaptic activation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
1

Year Published

1975
1975
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, each of these areas is apparently concerned in integrating some spinal and supraspinal inputs in reverberating circuits. These conclusions agree with previous electrophysiological and anatomical findings that suggest a feedback loop between the LRN and the NI (Kitai et al, 1974;Qvist, 1989) or the red nucleus (Kitai et al, 1974). The LRN-CN feedback loops may act as excitatory circuits (Kitai et al, 1974) to maintain the background excitability of the CN against the inhibitory Purkinje cell input (Ito, 1984…”
Section: Functional Considerationssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, each of these areas is apparently concerned in integrating some spinal and supraspinal inputs in reverberating circuits. These conclusions agree with previous electrophysiological and anatomical findings that suggest a feedback loop between the LRN and the NI (Kitai et al, 1974;Qvist, 1989) or the red nucleus (Kitai et al, 1974). The LRN-CN feedback loops may act as excitatory circuits (Kitai et al, 1974) to maintain the background excitability of the CN against the inhibitory Purkinje cell input (Ito, 1984…”
Section: Functional Considerationssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The lateral reticular nucleus (LRN) is one of the main precerebellar nuclei (see data and references in Ito, 1984). It receives afferent connections from the spinal cord (cat: Brodal, 1949;Morin et al, 1966;Kunzle, 1973;Clendenin et al, 1974a, b, c;Mizuno et al, 1975a ;Corvaja et al, 1977a;Hrycyshyn and Flumerfelt, 1981b, c;Westman et al, 1986;opossum: Martin et al, 1977;rat: Flumerfelt et al, 1982a, b;Menetrey et al, 1983;Shokunbi et al, 1985) and from various supraspinal centres such as the cerebral cortex, the red nucleus, the nuclei medialis and interpositalis of the cerebellum (man: Kuypers, 1958c; monkey: Kuypers, 1958b;Batton et al, 1977;cat: Walberg, 1958a, b;Kuypers, 1958a;Hinman and Carpenter, 1959;Walberg and Pompeiano, 1960;Courville, 1966;Brodal et al, 1967;Edwards, 1972;Kitai et al, 1974;Kunzle and Wiesendanger, 1974;Mizuno et al, 1975a;Corvaja et al, 1977a;Hrycyshyn and Flumerfelt, 1981a, b;Qvist et al, 1984;rabbit: Mizuno et al, 1973;opossum: Martin et al, 1977;rat: Shokunbi et al, 1986). Afferent terminals from the various afferent contingents have been found in partly overlapping regions of the LRN in both cats (Qvist, 1989) and rats (Rajakumar et al, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6B). Notably, our LRN stimulation never evoked antidromic activation of DCN cells (N = 29), contradicting the conclusions of [34] regarding the existence of a DCN-LRN projection. The relatively large spike increase that we observed, despite the small peak amplitude of the evoked EPSPs, could be explained by a potentially non-linear depolarization-to-spike coupling due to the NMDA receptor-dependent component of the MF responses of DCN cells [35].…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…As discussed above, spinal terminations within the LRt are arranged somatotopically and this somatotopic organization is conserved by LRt projections to the cerebellum (e.g., see Alstermark and Ekerot, 2013 ). Most LRt cells receive convergent inputs from different spinal and brain systems (e.g., see Kitai et al, 1974 ) and therefore the LRt has an integrative function. The cells forming SRT projections to the LRt are located principally in laminae VI, VII, and X where many last order premotor interneurons are located ( Tripodi et al, 2011 ) and therefore one of the functions of this pathway may be to monitor activity of such interneurons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%