2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.05.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrophysiological signatures of phonological and semantic maintenance in sentence repetition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
6
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results also parallel those previously reported for domain‐general working memory tasks (Jensen & Tesche, ; Onton, Delorme, & Makeig, ) where frontal theta power increased with memory load. Bonhage et al () additionally found stronger beta synchronization in response to word lists compared to sentences, while Meltzer et al () in contrast, found stronger beta desynchronization in response to word lists compared to sentences. Two important considerations make it difficult to compare the results from Bonhage et al () and Meltzer et al ().…”
Section: Working Memorymentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These results also parallel those previously reported for domain‐general working memory tasks (Jensen & Tesche, ; Onton, Delorme, & Makeig, ) where frontal theta power increased with memory load. Bonhage et al () additionally found stronger beta synchronization in response to word lists compared to sentences, while Meltzer et al () in contrast, found stronger beta desynchronization in response to word lists compared to sentences. Two important considerations make it difficult to compare the results from Bonhage et al () and Meltzer et al ().…”
Section: Working Memorymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Bonhage et al () additionally found stronger beta synchronization in response to word lists compared to sentences, while Meltzer et al () in contrast, found stronger beta desynchronization in response to word lists compared to sentences. Two important considerations make it difficult to compare the results from Bonhage et al () and Meltzer et al (). First, in Bonhage et al (), power in the delay period was expressed relative to power in a baseline interval at the end of the encoding period, while Meltzer et al () used a pre‐stimulus interval as their baseline.…”
Section: Working Memorymentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous studies particularly linking neural oscillations to working-memory processes supporting sentence processing have resulted in a diverse picture: Bonhage et al (2017) reported delta-band power increase during sentence encoding; Bastiaansen et al (2010) reported theta-band power increases for the processing of grammatically correct sentences; Meyer et al (2013) found alpha-band power increases during processing of working-memory intensive sentences; Bonhage et al (2017) showed that beta-band oscillations are sensitive to sentence-encoding demands. In the broad alpha/beta band, desynchronization was observed during sentence maintenance (i.e., delay period) in working memory (Meltzer et al, 2017), while synchronization was observed for syntactic binding in two-word sentences (Segaert et al, 2018). At the same time, theta-, alpha-, and beta-band activity has also been associated with verbal working memory outside of the sentence-comprehension domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%