The GnRH Neuron and Its Control 2018
DOI: 10.1002/9781119233275.ch8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrophysiology of Rodent GnRH Neurons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…50 This low spontaneous frequency is puzzling because GnRH neuron firing can be driven at much higher rates by current injection, suggesting that the ionic conductances of these cells are not in and of themselves limiting. 23,36 As reviewed previously, 20,21 GnRH neurons recorded in brain slices may be quiescent or spontaneously firing. Although most GnRH neurons exhibit irregular bursting, 1-2% of these cells exhibit parabolic bursting riding on marked slow (approximately 0.05 Hz) oscillations in membrane potential.…”
Section: Gnrh Neuron Firing Patternsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…50 This low spontaneous frequency is puzzling because GnRH neuron firing can be driven at much higher rates by current injection, suggesting that the ionic conductances of these cells are not in and of themselves limiting. 23,36 As reviewed previously, 20,21 GnRH neurons recorded in brain slices may be quiescent or spontaneously firing. Although most GnRH neurons exhibit irregular bursting, 1-2% of these cells exhibit parabolic bursting riding on marked slow (approximately 0.05 Hz) oscillations in membrane potential.…”
Section: Gnrh Neuron Firing Patternsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For an explanation of recording approaches, the reader is referred to previous reviews. [19][20][21] Initial studies of GnRH neuron properties suffered from a lack of consistent and rigorous methodology that had been established for patch clamp investigation; essentially no laboratory in the field escaped errors, ranging from use of inappropriate pipette solutions, to failure to report quality parameters allowing the reader to evaluate data integrity, as well as failure to explain how properties (e.g., action potential threshold, resting potential) were defined. These limitations resulted in variable data.…”
Section: Intrin S I C Propertie S Of G Nrh Neuronsmentioning
confidence: 99%