2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2016.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electroporation by subnanosecond pulses

Abstract: Electropermeabilization of cell membranes by micro- and nanosecond-duration stimuli has been studied extensively, whereas effects of picosecond electric pulses (psEP) remain essentially unexplored. We utilized whole-cell patch clamp and Di-8-ANEPPS voltage-sensitive dye measurements to characterize plasma membrane effects of 500 ps stimuli in rat hippocampal neurons (RHN), NG108, and CHO cells. Even a single 500-ps pulse at 190 kV/cm increased membrane conductance and depolarized cells. These effects were augm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another hallmark of electroporation is a persistent loss of the resting membrane potential due to leak currents 24 , 37 . In various types of cells, repair of the membrane and the restoration of the resting potential takes from tens of seconds to minutes 10 , 17 , 24 , 37 , 38 , consistent with data for other types of membrane injuries 39 . Then, repeated electroporating pulses which do not allow sufficient interval for the membrane repair would lead to cumulative damage and the complete loss of both the resting potential and fiber excitability.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Another hallmark of electroporation is a persistent loss of the resting membrane potential due to leak currents 24 , 37 . In various types of cells, repair of the membrane and the restoration of the resting potential takes from tens of seconds to minutes 10 , 17 , 24 , 37 , 38 , consistent with data for other types of membrane injuries 39 . Then, repeated electroporating pulses which do not allow sufficient interval for the membrane repair would lead to cumulative damage and the complete loss of both the resting potential and fiber excitability.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Persistent loss of the resting MP for tens of seconds and minutes is a well-known manifestation of cell membrane permeabilization (electroporation) by nsPEF[24, 25], but the time course of the depolarization and MP recovery have not been studied.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These numbers are promising for neurostimulation with nsPEF, but they have not been independently confirmed. The results of Cooper’s group are in stark contrast with other studies which utilized stimuli of comparable duration and reported 20- to 100-fold higher thresholds[24, 27, 28, 35, 36, 38, 40, 42]. Admittedly, all these other studies used endpoints other than AP generation in primary neurons, which could contribute to the inconsistency and emphasized the need to focus exactly on the AP induction in neurons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the cell permeabilization can also be caused by pulsed electric fields. The electric field at a distance of ~100  μ m from TPE was found to be 90 kV/cm, which is lower than 200 kV/cm, the field required to cause cell permeabilization in single-shot experiments previously reported for 0.5 ns pulses [5, 7]. But the temperature rise and intermittent jet pressure and microstreaming forces may likely assist in the membrane permeabilization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%