2000
DOI: 10.3109/15569520009051479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electroretinographic and Ophthalmologic Examinations in the Yucatan Micropig and in the Göttingen Minipig

Abstract: External gross observations of the eye and its adnexae, ocular reflexes, anterior ocular segment biomicroscopic examinations, fundic examinations performed with an indirect ophthalmoscope, and/or electroretinographic investigations (ERG) were carried out on 112 7-12month-old Yucatan micropigs, on 18 6-8-week-old, and 81 2-10-month old Gottingen minipigs to evaluate the incidence of observed ocular abnormalities and to compare the ERG waves. A statistical comparison was performed for these findings.The most imp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18 There are anatomic similarities in the structure of the retina as well, with the pig eye having a macula and a holangiotic type of retinal vasculature that is similar to humans. 19 In vivo, the human retina may be more resistant to enzymatic changes, owing to the greater thickness of its inner limiting membrane (1-2 m), as compared with pigs (0.03 m), therefore optimizing the sensitivity of the minipig model in terms of intravitreal tolerance of plasmin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…18 There are anatomic similarities in the structure of the retina as well, with the pig eye having a macula and a holangiotic type of retinal vasculature that is similar to humans. 19 In vivo, the human retina may be more resistant to enzymatic changes, owing to the greater thickness of its inner limiting membrane (1-2 m), as compared with pigs (0.03 m), therefore optimizing the sensitivity of the minipig model in terms of intravitreal tolerance of plasmin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When comparing ocular findings in both animal species, in minipigs no blurred zones were observed at funduscopy, no treatment-related corneal or conjunctival macroscopic changes were noted, and there were no plasmin-related postmortem findings, contrary to rabbits. The minipig, which appears to be a relevant model for humans, based on similarities in the anatomy of the posterior segment, 18,19 was the least sensitive to plasmin-related changes following a single injection. No sexrelated findings were reported in either species.…”
Section: Proksch Et Al 328mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lens opacities, including suture line abnormalities, are described as a normal background lesion in the Göttingen minipig (Loget 1995; Loget and Saint-Macary 2000). According to Loget and Saint-Macary (2000), the background incidence of lens abnormalities in the Göttingen minipig is reported to be 2.8% for suture line abnormality, 8.3% for focal nuclear opacity, 19.4% for posterior cortical pinpoint opacity, and 8.3% for posterior capsular opacity (Loget and Saint-Macary 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%