2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10008-008-0618-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrosorption of carbon dioxide on platinum group metals and alloys—a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

5
22
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
5
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the charge density recorded in the CO 2 ‐saturated electrolyte is approximately an order of magnitude lower than that in Ar‐saturated solution. This suggests that CO 2 adsorption inhibits the competing hydrogen processes . The systematic increase in charge density for CO 2 electrolysis at the CS1 electrocatalyst with variation in potential from −0.3 to −0.7 V is shown in Figure b.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Interestingly, the charge density recorded in the CO 2 ‐saturated electrolyte is approximately an order of magnitude lower than that in Ar‐saturated solution. This suggests that CO 2 adsorption inhibits the competing hydrogen processes . The systematic increase in charge density for CO 2 electrolysis at the CS1 electrocatalyst with variation in potential from −0.3 to −0.7 V is shown in Figure b.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…A similar effect was observed for Au‐Pd alloy electrodes, and linked to concomitant Pd‐hydride formation, which was more facile in alloys with a higher Pd content . Minor cathodic peaks can be seen between 0.3 and −0.3 V for CS5 and CS10, which could be linked to the adsorption of CO 2 to the catalyst surface . However, the most noticeable features for the thicker Pd layers correspond to the partial suppression of the H‐related responses in the positive scan up to approximately 0.4 V. In the case of Au nanoparticles and CS1, the differences in the voltammograms recorded with Ar‐ and CO 2 ‐saturated electrolytes in this potential range are rather minor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even after 30 min of CO 2 exposure, the hydrogen desorption peak is only partially suppressed, which compares to a full coverage after 5 minutes of CO (2% in Ar) exposure at the same potential. 21 In accordance with earlier reports, 9,12,22,23 the subsequent stripping peak is found in the double layer region. The broader oxidation peak after CO 2 exposure at 80 • C appears at a slightly lower potential (≈0.55 V) than that of CO (≈0.62 V), indicating that the adsorbed layer differs somewhat from that formed by CO.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As the applied potential exceeds the onset potential of the CO 2 reduction ( À 0.164 V), this reaction is activated. Essentially, two H þ are consumed for a CO formation as a result of one CO 2 molecule reduction 10,13,[27][28][29] . Thus, a fraction of both the existing H þ (from the electrolyte) and the electrons (on the catalyst surface) are consumed in CO 2 reduction reactions instead of HER reactions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%