1999
DOI: 10.1006/abio.1998.3048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometric Analysis of Blood for Differentiation of Species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, hemoglobin is not only very specific and highly abundant in blood but it also allows to distinguish between different species of origin. Espinoza et al found that hemoglobin, analyzed by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry, can resolve species by the presence of species determining peptides [24]. Despite extensive homology, all three species tested ( Homo sapiens , Canis familiaris , and Bos taurus ) were unambiguously annotated based on highly confident identification of species-specific peptide stretches.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, hemoglobin is not only very specific and highly abundant in blood but it also allows to distinguish between different species of origin. Espinoza et al found that hemoglobin, analyzed by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry, can resolve species by the presence of species determining peptides [24]. Despite extensive homology, all three species tested ( Homo sapiens , Canis familiaris , and Bos taurus ) were unambiguously annotated based on highly confident identification of species-specific peptide stretches.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases where traditional field identification guides and dichotomous keys prove inadequate, new methods must be developed for identifying such remains. In addition to traditional morphological techniques (Brazaitis, 1986;Busack and Pandya, 2001;Fuchs & Fuchs, 2003), such methods increasingly include genetics (see McDowall, this series) and analytical chemistry (Espinoza et al, 1996(Espinoza et al, , 1999Espinoza et al, 2007).…”
Section: Species Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional molecular methods for species identification have been mainly based on protein markers, immunological testing, electrophoresis, high-performance liquid chromatography analysis and DNA hybridization [5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. Application of such protocols has, however, failed to successfully differentiate closely related species, highlighting the need for a method with higher specificity and sensitivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%