“…As a comparison, the G-CD profiles of the A 3 -3, A 3 -6, A 3 -9, and A 3 -12 electrodes prepared with PANI coating shells were not exactly triangular because of the redox reaction of PANI (Figure b), but the almost symmetrical profile of the G-CD curves suggested an excellent Coulombic efficiency and the highly reversible charging–discharging transport of the electrodes. , The nonlinear appearance of discharge curves was due to the Faradaic reaction process. , Based on the charge–discharge curves, the C s values of A 3 , A 3 -3, A 3 -6, A 3 -9, and A 3 -12 calculated by eq were 74.2, 119.7, 164.6, 129.6, and 102.3 F g –1 , respectively. The highest C s value of the A 3 -6 electrode was analogous to that of different PANI-based electrodes previously reported, including the cellulose nanofiber/polyaniline nanohybrids prepared by polymerization (∼102 F g –1 ), polyaniline/cellulose nanofibers/natural rubber elastomer-based electrodes fabricated through a latex coagulation process (∼110 F g –1 ), porous PVA/polyaniline composite electrodes fabricated via a freeze/thaw method (∼150 F g –1 ), polyaniline/MWCNT fibrous electrodes prepared by an electrospinning technique (∼180 F g –1 ), and pectin–polyaniline hybrid aerogel-based electrodes prepared by a supercritical carbon dioxide drying method (∼184 F g –1 ) . For the A 3 -6 electrodes, the enhanced C s value was first attributed to the synergism of the CNT–CNC nanohybrids and PANI, which could substantially improve the electrochemical performance of PANI itself .…”