1982
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3886(82)90017-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrostatic charging problems of spacecraft

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(6), in which case fp . Since the electric field at the elec trode surface measured in this experiment12 8is approximately E(O) = 1 x 10 Vim, from3 2 Eq. (6) P E 2.7 x 10 N/m.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…(6), in which case fp . Since the electric field at the elec trode surface measured in this experiment12 8is approximately E(O) = 1 x 10 Vim, from3 2 Eq. (6) P E 2.7 x 10 N/m.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…41 The secondary yield (that can be higher than the incoming primary particle flux) 42 is a function of the surface material and the primary particle energy. The mean energy of the secondary electron leaving the surface is very low, T Se ≈ 2-3 eV 34,43,44 and will return to the surface of a positively charge craft (no net current effect).…”
Section: Power Requirements To Maintain a Fixed Potential In A Plasmamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This electrification is mainly due to the electrons. Many experiments on electrification by electron beam irradiation and its discharge have been conducted by simulation of satellite electrification on the ground [1,2,3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%