[Ru(BPY)2POQ−Nmet]2+ and
[Ru(TAP)2POQ−Nmet]2+ (1
and 3) are bifunctional complexes composed of
a metallic unit linked by a flexible chain to an organic unit.
They have been prepared as photoprobes or
photoreagents of DNA. In this work, the spectroscopic properties
of these bifunctional complexes in the
absence of DNA are compared with those of the monofunctional analogues
[Ru(BPY)2Phen]2+,
[Ru(BPY)2acPhen]2+,
[Ru(TAP)2Phen]2+, and
[Ru(TAP)2acPhen]2+ (2 and
4). The electrospray mass spectrometry
and absorption data show that the quinoline moiety exists in the
protonated and nonprotonated form. Although
the bifunctional complex containing 2,2‘-bipyridine (BPY) ligands
exhibits photophysical properties similar
to those of the monofunctional compounds, the bifunctional complex with
1,4,5,8-tetraazaphenanthrene (TAP)
ligands behaves quite differently. It has weaker relative emission
quantum yields and shorter luminescence
lifetimes than the monofunctional TAP analogue when the quinoline unit
is nonprotonated. This indicates an
efficient intramolecular quenching of the 3MLCT (metal
to ligand charge transfer) excited state of the TAP
metallic moiety. When the organic unit is protonated, there is no
internal quenching. In organic solvent, the
nonquenched excited metallic unit (bearing a protonated quinoline) and
the quenched one (bearing a
nonprotonated organic unit) are in slow equilibrium as compared to the
lifetime of the two emitters. In
aqueous solution this equilibrium is faster and is catalysed by the
presence of phosphate buffer. Flash photolysis
experiments suggest that the intramolecular quenching process
originates from a photoinduced electron transfer
from the nonprotonated quinoline to the excited
Ru(TAP)2
2+ moiety.