2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00249-009-0497-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrostatic interactions during Kv1.2 N-type inactivation: random-walk simulation

Abstract: N-type inactivation of the Kv1.2 voltage-gated potassium channel is a process in which the N-terminal of the protein (its first 20 amino acids) binds to the open-channel surface, extends and occludes its pore. This process has been experimentally studied in both intact and ShBDelta6-46 channels in which the inactivating peptides are supplied in the bath solution. In this work we provide a qualitative description of N-type inactivation by simulating the random walk of charged inactivating peptides in the electr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The unbalanced charge sticks to the membrane within the Debye length (Rubinstein 1990), contributing to a gradient in the ionic concentration. The Debye length in a cellular environment is of the order of 0.7 nm (Małysiak and Grzywna 2009), which cannot be directly reflected by the results on a lattice spacing of 1 μm, and a smaller spacing is impossible to apply due to computer time limitations. The boundary concentration change shown in the chart is therefore averaged over 1 μm, and one should bear in mind that it is expected to be 1 μm/0.7 nm = 1,429 times larger within the Debye layer where the concentration can reach a value being 18 % smaller than it is in the bulk concentration.
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unbalanced charge sticks to the membrane within the Debye length (Rubinstein 1990), contributing to a gradient in the ionic concentration. The Debye length in a cellular environment is of the order of 0.7 nm (Małysiak and Grzywna 2009), which cannot be directly reflected by the results on a lattice spacing of 1 μm, and a smaller spacing is impossible to apply due to computer time limitations. The boundary concentration change shown in the chart is therefore averaged over 1 μm, and one should bear in mind that it is expected to be 1 μm/0.7 nm = 1,429 times larger within the Debye layer where the concentration can reach a value being 18 % smaller than it is in the bulk concentration.
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%