1994
DOI: 10.1016/0924-4247(94)00813-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrostatically driven vacuum-encapsulated polysilicon resonators

Abstract: In this paper, the design, modelling and performance characteristics of electrostatically driven vacuum-encapsulated polysilicon resonators are addressed. A one-port configuration is preferably employed for excitation and detection of the vibration. Mechanical instability (pull-in) is discussed on the basis of the energy minimum principle. An expression for the pull-in voltage of a beam is given. The electromechanical behaviour in a limited frequency regime around the fundamental resonance is accurately modell… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
231
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 351 publications
(249 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
18
231
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For convenience, we introduce the nondimensional variables (denoted by hats) (5) where t ͂ is a time scale, as defined below. Substituting equation (5) into equation (4) and dropping the hats, we obtain (6) The nondimensional parameters appearing in equation (6) are…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For convenience, we introduce the nondimensional variables (denoted by hats) (5) where t ͂ is a time scale, as defined below. Substituting equation (5) into equation (4) and dropping the hats, we obtain (6) The nondimensional parameters appearing in equation (6) are…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pull-in voltage of this microbeam based on a static analysis [7,27] is 0.652 V, and accounting for the transient effect it is 0.6 V. Figure 11(a) shows the time response of the microbeam when actuated by a voltage load V dc = 0.36 V and subjected to a mechanical shock pulse of amplitude 400 g and duration 1.0 ms. Here, W max /d is the maximum deflection of the microbeam at x = L normalized to d, and t is the nondimensional time, as defined in (5). It turns out that the first natural period of the microbeam is much smaller than the pulse duration, and hence the microbeam experiences the mechanical shock as a quasi-static load.…”
Section: Response Of Mems Devices Employing Cantilever Microbeamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To validate the present analysis, the first natural frequency of C-C micro-beams is compared with experimental results provided by Tilmans and Legtenberg [2]. The micro-beam is made of pure poly-silicon in the validation example, and the Young's modulus E = 151 GPa.…”
Section: Validation Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Counteracting the electrostatic force is the elastic force, which tries to restore the movable electrode to its original position. Meanwhile, an instantaneous excitation will induce free vibration of the micro-beam at the deflected state and the natural frequencies of the system are influenced by the static deflection [2][3][4].…”
Section: Introduction mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the device is overdamped and a step voltage, V step , slightly higher than the static pull-in [9], is applied to the structure (V step = αV pi , with 1 < α < 1.1), a pull-in motion characterized by a meta-stable region is observed (figure 2).…”
Section: Dynamic Pull-in: Meta-stable Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%