2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.89.034023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electroweak corrections toBs,d+

Abstract: We calculate the full two-loop electroweak matching corrections to the operator governing the decay Bq → + − in the Standard Model. Their inclusion removes an electroweak scheme and scale uncertainty of about ±7% of the branching ratio. Using different renormalization schemes of the involved electroweak parameters, we estimate residual perturbative electroweak and QED uncertainties to be less than ±1% at the level of the branching ratio.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

4
126
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
126
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This quantity is used to evaluate the W -boson pole mass according to the fit formula in Eqs. (6) and (9) of Ref. [12], which gives M W = 80.358 (8) GeV, consistently with the direct measurement M W = 80.385 (15) GeV [13].…”
supporting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This quantity is used to evaluate the W -boson pole mass according to the fit formula in Eqs. (6) and (9) of Ref. [12], which gives M W = 80.358 (8) GeV, consistently with the direct measurement M W = 80.385 (15) GeV [13].…”
supporting
confidence: 57%
“…When µ b is varied from m b /2 to 2m b , our results for |C A (µ b )| 2 vary by about 0.3%, which corresponds to a typical size of O(α em ) corrections that undergo no extra enhancement. On the other hand, the NLO EW corrections to |C A (µ b )| 2 often reach a few percent level [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It incorporates effects from heavy NP to the SM contribution and is evolved to the scale of the B-meson, µ b ∼ m b . The SM part includes perturbative next-to-leading-order (NLO) QCD [36][37][38] as well as recently calculated next-to-next-toleading (NNLO) QCD [39] and NLO electroweak [40] corrections, which we all include in our analysis. However, at leading order, we have that…”
Section: Jhep02(2015)141mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which we have obtained from the recently improved SM prediction [40][41][42] and the combined CMS and LHCb result [43] by treating the individual uncertainties as Gaussian errors. In order to set bounds on the TGCs from the modified Zbb couplings (3.6), we employ the result of a recent global analysis [44] of the complete set of 15 EW precision observables, which leads to…”
Section: Jhep09(2015)018mentioning
confidence: 99%