1984
DOI: 10.1351/pac198456060695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Element by element review of their atomic weights

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[4] These three footnotes "were later discarded because they had no consequential effect for the user other than that inherent in the tabulated atomic weight and uncertainty values." [2] Footnote "f" (Most commonly available long-lived isotope) was later discarded because a table of radioactive isotopes was provided. The footnote "g", which indicated some geological specimens could have a highly anomalous isotopic composition and atomic weight, was attached to argon, strontium, lead, and radium.…”
Section: Past Footnotes and Annotations Of Atomic-weight Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…[4] These three footnotes "were later discarded because they had no consequential effect for the user other than that inherent in the tabulated atomic weight and uncertainty values." [2] Footnote "f" (Most commonly available long-lived isotope) was later discarded because a table of radioactive isotopes was provided. The footnote "g", which indicated some geological specimens could have a highly anomalous isotopic composition and atomic weight, was attached to argon, strontium, lead, and radium.…”
Section: Past Footnotes and Annotations Of Atomic-weight Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A normal material was defined in the 1969 TSAW [4] and again by Peiser et al [2], and the definition is provided in Section 1. The first use of normal material in a footnote was in the 1971 TSAW [5], for footnote "d":…”
Section: Normal Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations