1976
DOI: 10.1130/0016-7606(1976)87<754:eaigon>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elemental and isotopic geochemistry of nonhydrated quartz latite glasses from the Eureka Valley Tuff, east-central California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This unit, which we refer to as the Lava Flow Member of the Eureka Valley Tuff, includes both normal-and reversed-polarity lava flows ), and ranges from trachyandesite to trachydacite in composition (Koerner et al 2009). The Dardanelles Formation, which also consists of high-K lavas flows (trachyandesites or shoshonites), has long been inferred to lie above the Eureka Valley Tuff (Slemmons 1966;Noble et al 1974Noble et al , 1976, although no maps or measured sections were previously published to demonstrate that it lies above all three members of the Eureka Valley Tuff; previous workers have therefore confused it with the Lava Flow Member of the Eureka Valley Tuff or the Table Mountain Latite at some localities (Koerner et al 2009). New mapping west of Sonora Pass demonstrates that trachyandesite lava flows do in fact overlie the upper member of the Eureka Valley Tuff (Koerner et al 2009).…”
Section: Eruption Of 16 Ma Flood Basalts Through Incipient Sierran Frmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This unit, which we refer to as the Lava Flow Member of the Eureka Valley Tuff, includes both normal-and reversed-polarity lava flows ), and ranges from trachyandesite to trachydacite in composition (Koerner et al 2009). The Dardanelles Formation, which also consists of high-K lavas flows (trachyandesites or shoshonites), has long been inferred to lie above the Eureka Valley Tuff (Slemmons 1966;Noble et al 1974Noble et al , 1976, although no maps or measured sections were previously published to demonstrate that it lies above all three members of the Eureka Valley Tuff; previous workers have therefore confused it with the Lava Flow Member of the Eureka Valley Tuff or the Table Mountain Latite at some localities (Koerner et al 2009). New mapping west of Sonora Pass demonstrates that trachyandesite lava flows do in fact overlie the upper member of the Eureka Valley Tuff (Koerner et al 2009).…”
Section: Eruption Of 16 Ma Flood Basalts Through Incipient Sierran Frmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Sequence 3 includes high-K lava flows and ignimbrites in the Sonora Pass to Ebbetts Pass region, and andesitic volcanic and volcaniclastic rocks in the Ebbetts Pass to Carson Pass region (Busby et al 2008a,b;Hagan et al 2009; and our unpublished mapping). Numerous workers have inferred that the high-K rocks erupted from the Little Walker Caldera, also referred to as the Little Walker Center (Slemmons 1966;Noble et al 1974Noble et al , 1976Priest 1979;King et al 2007;Putirka and Busby 2007;Busby et al 2008b;Koerner et al 2009;Pluhar et al 2009). …”
Section: Eruption Of 16 Ma Flood Basalts Through Incipient Sierran Frmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, recent work in presumed vent-proximal areas of the Sierra Nevada range front and the Sweetwater Mountains shows that latite lava flows are present within the EVT, between the Tollhouse Flat and By-Day members (Hagan et al 2008). This called into question whether the Dardanelles Formation actually exists as a formation that overlies all three members of the EVT (as defined by Noble et al 1976), or whether it should be redefined as a member of the EVT (Hagan et al 2008). As discussed by Koerner et al (2009), we have recently mapped and measured a section, where a latite lava flow not only lies between the Tollhouse and By-Day members but also another flow overlies the Upper Member.…”
Section: Stratigraphy Of Tertiary Volcanic Rocks In the Sonora Pass Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous papers have presented small geochemical data sets in stratigraphic context (Ransome, 1898;Noble et al, 1976;Putirka and Busby, 2007; , 2008a, 2013bKoerner et al, 2009), or used those data sets as part of a regional-scale analysis du Bray et al, 2014). However, this is the first paper to present a large geochemical data set in stratigraphic and intrusive context (Table 1), plotted on maps (Fig.…”
Section: Field and Petrographic Characteristics And Newmentioning
confidence: 99%