2013
DOI: 10.1140/epjst/e2013-01928-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elementary models of dynamic networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Without link removal ( K = 0%), we observed that in the Erős-Rényi random network, link turnover resulted in interrupted disease spread compared to the static case, with decreasing final outbreak sizes as the turnover rate increased. These results are consistent with other studies of epidemic outcomes as a function of network dynamics (Fefferman and Ng, 2007; Gulyás et al, 2013). The relative performance of the four link removal algorithms is similar to the static case: reactive algorithms vastly outperform preventive ones and removing links in order of S-I edge centrality achieved the smallest outbreak sizes for small link removal budgets, while optimal quarantining averts a substantial number of infections once the link removal budget exceeds a threshold ( K = 20% in this case).…”
Section: Performance Of Link Removal Algorithmssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Without link removal ( K = 0%), we observed that in the Erős-Rényi random network, link turnover resulted in interrupted disease spread compared to the static case, with decreasing final outbreak sizes as the turnover rate increased. These results are consistent with other studies of epidemic outcomes as a function of network dynamics (Fefferman and Ng, 2007; Gulyás et al, 2013). The relative performance of the four link removal algorithms is similar to the static case: reactive algorithms vastly outperform preventive ones and removing links in order of S-I edge centrality achieved the smallest outbreak sizes for small link removal budgets, while optimal quarantining averts a substantial number of infections once the link removal budget exceeds a threshold ( K = 20% in this case).…”
Section: Performance Of Link Removal Algorithmssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Using the dynamic network framework described by Gulyás et al (2013) and Gulyás and Kampis (2013), we simulated outbreaks in networks with different rates of link turnover, determined by the rate of link acquisition. We set the rate of link termination such that it balanced the process of link formation to maintain the same number of links in the network, on average, over time.…”
Section: Performance Of Link Removal Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most classical approach consists in splitting time into slices and then building a graph, often called snapshot, for each time slice: its nodes and links represent the interactions that occurred during this time slice. One obtains a sequence of snapshots (one for each slice), and may study the time-evolution of their properties, see for instance [65,43,61,27,7,79], among many others. In [3], the authors even design a general framework to combine and aggregate wide classes of temporal properties, thus providing a unified approach for snapshot sequence studies.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…if sa < s b then 8: sc ← sa; vc ← va 21: c.append((sc, fc, vc)) 22: return standard(c) a = [(1, 5, 2), (6, 8, 1), (11,12,3), (14,16,2), (17,18,5), (19, 20, 1)] b = [(2, 3, 4), (4, 7, 3), (9, 10, 2), (13,15,5), (16, 21, 1)]…”
Section: B Operationalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%