2002
DOI: 10.1023/a:1020184007550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elementary Polyhedral Mereotopology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• all non-empty regular closed subsets of R n [6] • all open polygonal (polyhedral, etc) subsets of R n [13,14,15] In these interpretations, it is usual to interpret the predicates P and C as standing for the following relations:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• all non-empty regular closed subsets of R n [6] • all open polygonal (polyhedral, etc) subsets of R n [13,14,15] In these interpretations, it is usual to interpret the predicates P and C as standing for the following relations:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first case, one focuses on the interdefinability of primitive relations assumed in the theories to prove the equivalence of their axiomatics, while in the second case, one compares (classes of) models of these theories. Systematic analyses of these kinds have been developed on mereotopologies: Casati & Varzi (1999), Simons (1987), and Masolo & Vieu (1999) consider the syntactic level, while Biacino & Gerla (1991, Asher & Vieu (1995), Pratt-Hartmann & Schoop (1998, 2002, Roeper (1997), and Stell (2000) focus on the semantic level.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%