2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.enfi.2020.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elementos esenciales para elaborar un estudio con el método (e)Delphi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“… Delphi study participants: The adequate selection of the participants in a Delphi study is a determining factor, although there is no consensus on the recommended number in the selection of experts to be included [ 19 , 23 , 24 ]. Romero-Collado [ 24 ] includes results similar to Carretero-Dios and Pérez in [ 24 ], who argued for a minimum of 3 experts; on their part, Yánez and Cuadra (2008) in [ 24 ] recommend between 10 and 18, and on the contrary, Humphrey-Murto [ 20 ] recommend a minimum of 6 and more than 12 in the case that the experts come from the same discipline, and lastly, Toronto in [ 24 ] considers that 12 to 20 experts is sufficient. Therefore, given the lack of consensus in the literature consulted, the guidelines used in the development of the original EC-PC scale [ 1 ] were followed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… Delphi study participants: The adequate selection of the participants in a Delphi study is a determining factor, although there is no consensus on the recommended number in the selection of experts to be included [ 19 , 23 , 24 ]. Romero-Collado [ 24 ] includes results similar to Carretero-Dios and Pérez in [ 24 ], who argued for a minimum of 3 experts; on their part, Yánez and Cuadra (2008) in [ 24 ] recommend between 10 and 18, and on the contrary, Humphrey-Murto [ 20 ] recommend a minimum of 6 and more than 12 in the case that the experts come from the same discipline, and lastly, Toronto in [ 24 ] considers that 12 to 20 experts is sufficient. Therefore, given the lack of consensus in the literature consulted, the guidelines used in the development of the original EC-PC scale [ 1 ] were followed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preliminary version of the scale was distributed to a group of experts to consult and attain consensus about the adaptation of the items [21] ( Stone, 1993) through the use of the Delphi method. This method of group decision allows us to discover the opinion of a group of experts about a subject in a structured manner through a questionnaire, in which the elimination or inclusion of items was conducted through agreement [19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. This group of experts analyzed the dimensionality of the first version of the questionnaire (EC-PC-Family V1) and the adaptation of its items, individually assessing the convergence of the subject [26].…”
Section: Last Version After Agreement Of Expertsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esta fase se inicia a partir del análisis de los datos proporcionados por los entrevistados que permitió la creación de preguntas por parte de equipo investigador, siguiendo las directrices ya aplicadas en otros estudios en ciencias de la salud (183,184,187,360) . A pesar de seguir las directrices de la EfCCNa, se observa como algunos elementos son transversales a los propios ámbitos y subámbitos creados (48) .…”
Section: Faseunclassified