This study investigates the question of whether Québec possesses a different culture of male partner violence against women than the rest of Canada. It is hypothesized that Québec will have a lower prevalence of violence than the rest of Canada and that men in Québec who hold patriarchal attitudes will be more likely to be violent than those who do not. Using a large-scale representative sample of Canadian women, tests provide support for both hypotheses. The key to understanding the difference in prevalence between the two cultural groups is patriarchal domination, and the common thread for interpretation of many cultural differences in risk markers is patriarchy.Canada has a history of regional polarity on indicators of social disorder. Through most of the 20th century, several researchers studying such problems as divorce, suicide, and drug offenses discovered that these indicators of social disorganization tended to be more prevalent as one moves from the east to the west coast of Canada. Drawing from Durhkeim, the main explanation for this pattern seems to be that the settlement of the frontier is characterized by less integration into the collectivity (Goyder, 1993). As one moved west, there was a higher ratio of men to women, more rapid economic changes, more immigration, and more internal migration. However, toward the end of the 20th century, indicators of social disorganization converged across regions in Canada such that rates of various measures of social disorgani-87 AUTHOR'S NOTE: This research was supported by a University of Manitoba research grant. The author wishes to thank the anonymous reviewers for their excellent comments on an earlier draft of this article.