2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0951-8339(02)00014-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elements of risk analysis for collision and grounding of a RoRo passenger ferry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In impact study, merchant ship tends to be an observation object as it has high probability to experience such load. Demand to expand the studies to other marine vessels is fulfilled by Otto et al [51] and Prabowo et al [52] as Ro-Ro passenger ship is taken as observation object, where Otto directed his study on risk analysis for collision and grounding, and Prabowo focused his attention to structural behavior accounting for external dynamics of ship collision. Investigation of structural performance under impact load, especially in shoal grounding case was carried by Yu et al [53] where in ship collision case, concern on double hull design against impact load, failure, and oil spill were addressed by Hong and Amdahl [35], Pedersen & Li [54], Yip et al [55] and Hegazy et al [56].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In impact study, merchant ship tends to be an observation object as it has high probability to experience such load. Demand to expand the studies to other marine vessels is fulfilled by Otto et al [51] and Prabowo et al [52] as Ro-Ro passenger ship is taken as observation object, where Otto directed his study on risk analysis for collision and grounding, and Prabowo focused his attention to structural behavior accounting for external dynamics of ship collision. Investigation of structural performance under impact load, especially in shoal grounding case was carried by Yu et al [53] where in ship collision case, concern on double hull design against impact load, failure, and oil spill were addressed by Hong and Amdahl [35], Pedersen & Li [54], Yip et al [55] and Hegazy et al [56].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, the three causation probability values are 1·30 × 10 −4 for crossing encounters, 4·90 × 10 −5 for overtaking encounters and 4·90 × 10 −5 for head-on encounters, respectively. Considering the fact that the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore has used the Vessel Traffic Service (VTS) system to monitor the Singapore port fairways, it is reasonable to assume that the causation probabilities for the crossing encounters are 6·83 × 10 −5 in good visibility (e.g., daytime periods) and 4·64 × 10 −4 in poor visibility (e.g., night time periods), which were suggested by Otto et al (2002). Table 3 reports that the overall ship collision frequency in five fairways is 3·27 per year.…”
Section: S H I P C O L L I S I O N F R E Qu E N C Y E S T I M At I O mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distribution of ships' speeds, total area studied. Fujii et al, 1974;Fowler and Sørgård, 2000;Otto et al, 2002;Rosqvist et al, 2002;Kujala et al, 2009;Hänninen and Kujala, 2010;Montewka et al, 2010).…”
Section: R I S K O F S H I P -S H I P Co L L I S I O N O F F T H E Pomentioning
confidence: 99%