2018
DOI: 10.15288/jsad.2018.79.929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elevated Behavioral Economic Demand for Alcohol in Co-Users of Alcohol and Cannabis

Abstract: Co-use of cannabis and alcohol is associated with increased drinking and other negative consequences relative to use of alcohol alone. One potential explanation for these differences is overvaluation of alcohol (e.g., alcohol demand) among co-users, similar to established overvaluation of alcohol among tobacco and alcohol co-users. This study examined differences in alcohol demand between an alcohol and cannabis co-user group and an alcohol-only group. Method: A large sample of adult drinkers (n = 1,643, 54% f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results also showed that individuals with greater cannabis use were more likely to be in the HRHD class relative to the MRLD class, which is consistent with studies that have shown that concurrent cannabis use is associated with greater levels of alcohol demand (Morris et al, 2018; Naudé, Reed, Thornton, & Amlung, 2020; Ramirez, Cadigan, & Lee, 2020), lower substance-free reinforcement (Meshesha, Dennhardt, & Murphy, 2015), and higher rates of problematic alcohol use (Naudé et al, 2020). This result extends the findings of previous studies that demonstrate the association of polysubstance use and maladaptive decision-making.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The results also showed that individuals with greater cannabis use were more likely to be in the HRHD class relative to the MRLD class, which is consistent with studies that have shown that concurrent cannabis use is associated with greater levels of alcohol demand (Morris et al, 2018; Naudé, Reed, Thornton, & Amlung, 2020; Ramirez, Cadigan, & Lee, 2020), lower substance-free reinforcement (Meshesha, Dennhardt, & Murphy, 2015), and higher rates of problematic alcohol use (Naudé et al, 2020). This result extends the findings of previous studies that demonstrate the association of polysubstance use and maladaptive decision-making.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The present experiment examined relations between demand and delay discounting in college students who endorsed either alcohol use or dual use of alcohol and cannabis. Consistent with Morris et al (2018), dual users reported significantly greater demand for alcoholic drinks and had higher rates of problematic use as defined by the AUDIT. Specifically, 68% of participants endorsing dual use ( n = 58) met criteria for harmful alcohol consumption compared with 23% ( n = 11) of participants who endorsed only alcohol use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Also, because our sample was drawn from a larger sample of Canadian drinkers it is possible that cannabis use motives in our sample may have differed systematically from those of cannabis-only users. Co-use of cannabis and alcohol is associated with elevated alcohol demand ( Morris et al, 2018 ), so it is possible that co-use may also systematically impact both cannabis demand and motives for use. Finally, we acknowledge that our sample had a rather high level of income (greater than 50% of participants reported an annual household income > $80,000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%