Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
BACKGROUND Whole blood (WB) transfusion, compared with blood component therapy (CT), has been shown to have superior outcomes in the military population. However, whether this translates to the civilian population remains understudied. This study sought to determine the effect of WB on short-term in-hospital outcomes. METHODS This retrospective cohort study included trauma patients at a Level I trauma center who received either WB or CT upon massive transfusion protocol activation between January 2021 and June 2023. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, and secondary outcomes included 24-hour mortality, 7-day mortality, 30-day mortality, trauma-induced coagulopathy, and the number of transfusion events required. The effect of transfusion type on patient outcomes was evaluated using a propensity-weighted modified Poisson regression. RESULTS Of 1,027 massive transfusion protocol–activated patients, 480 (46.8%) received any WB. The propensity score weighting balanced the covariate distribution between the transfusion groups. Significant effect modification (p < 0.05) by injury type (blunt vs. penetrating) on mortality outcomes was observed. Compared with CT recipients, penetrating trauma patients who received WB had a significantly lower adjusted risk of in-hospital (risk ratio [RR], 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15–0.89), 7-day (RR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.15–0.94), and 30-day (RR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.15–0.89) mortality but not significantly different 24-hour mortality (RR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.15–1.00; p = 0.05). An elevated risk of trauma-induced coagulopathy was observed among WB recipients than CT recipients with blunt trauma (RR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.07–2.36) but not among patients with penetrating injury (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.30–1.40). Compared with CT recipients, WB recipients had reduced transfusion rates for both penetrating (RR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36–0.95) and blunt-related injuries (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58–0.91). CONCLUSION The effect of WB on in-hospital mortality is modified by injury type, suggesting the need to consider penetrating injury as an important indication for WB resuscitation. In addition, WB reduces transfusion requirements across both injury types, decreasing patient exposure to transfusion events. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.
BACKGROUND Whole blood (WB) transfusion, compared with blood component therapy (CT), has been shown to have superior outcomes in the military population. However, whether this translates to the civilian population remains understudied. This study sought to determine the effect of WB on short-term in-hospital outcomes. METHODS This retrospective cohort study included trauma patients at a Level I trauma center who received either WB or CT upon massive transfusion protocol activation between January 2021 and June 2023. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, and secondary outcomes included 24-hour mortality, 7-day mortality, 30-day mortality, trauma-induced coagulopathy, and the number of transfusion events required. The effect of transfusion type on patient outcomes was evaluated using a propensity-weighted modified Poisson regression. RESULTS Of 1,027 massive transfusion protocol–activated patients, 480 (46.8%) received any WB. The propensity score weighting balanced the covariate distribution between the transfusion groups. Significant effect modification (p < 0.05) by injury type (blunt vs. penetrating) on mortality outcomes was observed. Compared with CT recipients, penetrating trauma patients who received WB had a significantly lower adjusted risk of in-hospital (risk ratio [RR], 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15–0.89), 7-day (RR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.15–0.94), and 30-day (RR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.15–0.89) mortality but not significantly different 24-hour mortality (RR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.15–1.00; p = 0.05). An elevated risk of trauma-induced coagulopathy was observed among WB recipients than CT recipients with blunt trauma (RR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.07–2.36) but not among patients with penetrating injury (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.30–1.40). Compared with CT recipients, WB recipients had reduced transfusion rates for both penetrating (RR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36–0.95) and blunt-related injuries (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58–0.91). CONCLUSION The effect of WB on in-hospital mortality is modified by injury type, suggesting the need to consider penetrating injury as an important indication for WB resuscitation. In addition, WB reduces transfusion requirements across both injury types, decreasing patient exposure to transfusion events. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.