Understanding the response of large river ecosystems to anthropogenic stressors, and their interactions with natural system disturbances, is challenging (Stanley et al., 2010). Ecosystems are inherently dynamic, changing both naturally and in response to anthropogenic stressors. Understanding how and why ecosystems change is central to ecosystem science (Sutherland et al., 2013), and river ecosystems-like other complex systems-are characterized by self-organization, nonlinear dynamics, and the potential for multiple stable states (Folke et al., 2010;Holling & Gunderson, 2002). Anthropogenic activities are increasingly pervasive and superimposed on the natural river template. Research that distinguishes between natural and human contributions to the "disturbance regime" of large river ecosystems has been limited to date (cf. Gupta, 2021;Hampton et al., 2019;Thoms & Sheldon, 2019). The lack of integrated conceptual frameworks (Ormerod et al., 2010) and long-term data (Hampton et al., 2019) restricts current efforts to understand the effect of multiple stressors in large river ecosystems (Craig et al., 2017).Resilience thinking is a model for examining change in ecosystems. Complex systems are conceptualized to have dynamic trajectories that may not tend toward equilibrium conditions; rather, they move through an adaptive cycle in response to resource variations. Adaptive cycles characterize change as a cycle comprised of four phases: