2013
DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elevated methane emissions from a paddy field in southeast China occur after applying anaerobic digestion slurry

Abstract: One hundred million tons of farm stalk waste and livestock and poultry excrement are used every year in China for the production of clean energy (biogas) by anaerobic digestion. Consequently, a large amount of fermented liquid is produced, and if disposed of improperly, it will result in secondary pollution. Agricultural application of this anaerobic slurry as a liquid fertilizer would reduce possible eutrophication of water sources from random slurry discharge and supply a superior organic fertilizer for farm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies have also found no differences in methane emissions when mineral fertilizers are replaced by PS [22] or ADPS [28] at the same N rates. However, opposite results were reported by Huang et al [29] who found significant CH 4 increases when mineral fertilizer was replaced by ADPS and the application was fractioned (40% base, 25% tillering, and 35% heading), but no differences were found when ADPS was applied in a unique application (base fertilization).…”
Section: Methane Fluxes and Cumulative Emissionscontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other studies have also found no differences in methane emissions when mineral fertilizers are replaced by PS [22] or ADPS [28] at the same N rates. However, opposite results were reported by Huang et al [29] who found significant CH 4 increases when mineral fertilizer was replaced by ADPS and the application was fractioned (40% base, 25% tillering, and 35% heading), but no differences were found when ADPS was applied in a unique application (base fertilization).…”
Section: Methane Fluxes and Cumulative Emissionscontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Win et al [23] reported that cumulative methane emissions for the growing season were 1.6 times higher for ADPS-fertilized plots than for plots with chemical fertilization, but with no significant differences, while no differences in N 2 O fluxes were found between the two types of fertilizers. Huang et al [29] found significant increases in CH 4 emissions by applying ADPS. Under Mediterranean rice conditions, only Maris et al [22] studied the application of PS to flooded rice, and their results showed no significant differences in GHG emissions and GWP for PS fertilization compared to ammonium fertilization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A small amount of CH 4 emissions were also found by Odlare et al (2012) at 1 and 7 d after biogas slurry application in a laboratory incubation experiment. But other studies show contradicting results; Huang et al (2013) found 3-84% greater CH 4 emissions from pig BS application than from chemical fertilizer in a paddy field in China. Our previous studies found a risk of CH 4 emission from a paddy field fertilized with cow BS (Win et al 2010;Sasada et al 2011) compared with chemical fertilizer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…There are not many studies available about the effect of BS application on CH 4 emission in rice paddy (Debnath et al 1996;Win et al 2010Win et al , 2012Sasada et al 2011;Odlare et al 2012;Huang et al 2013). Debnath et al (1996) found very low and no significant difference in CH 4 emission (2.09 and 2.2 g CH 4 m −2 ) between 120 kg nitrogen (N) urea and urea plus biogas spent slurry (60 kg urea + 60 kg N from BS) in an Indian rice field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anaerobic digestion was considered to be a promising option for the treatment of waste, which could solve the problem of waste contamination and produce energy. With the further development of anaerobic digestion, an increasing output of ADW, which typically contained high concentrations of ammonium, phosphate, and suspended solids, was inevitable and approximately 385 million tons of liquid waste had been generated by over 30 million methane-generating tanks [ 1 ]. ADW also had a high N:P ratio and chemical oxygen demand (COD), so it was difficult to treat ADW by conventional biological processes, such as by waste lagoons [ 2 ], sequencing batch biofilm reactors (SBBRs) and sequencing batch reactors (SBRs) [ 3 ], which was complex, had a higher cost or did not have renewable matter cycles during treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%