2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2006.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elevated plus-maze performance of Fischer-344 rats as a function of age and of exposure to 56Fe particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the older rats exposed to 1000 MeV/n 28 Si particles required a higher dose to disrupt recognition memory compared to the younger subjects (50 cGy in the older animals compared to 25 cGy in the younger animals; Figure 3E, Figure 3F). However, as noted with the results following exposure to 16 O particles, the increase in the dose needed to disrupt recognition memory in the rats when retested nine months following the original test may have resulted from the reduction in the percentage of time the non-irradiated control rats spent exploring the novel object. Because the measure of the performance of the younger control subjects was not reliable (only 3 non-irradiated controls met criterion on the first test), it was not possible to statistically compare the performance of the radiated and control subjects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, the older rats exposed to 1000 MeV/n 28 Si particles required a higher dose to disrupt recognition memory compared to the younger subjects (50 cGy in the older animals compared to 25 cGy in the younger animals; Figure 3E, Figure 3F). However, as noted with the results following exposure to 16 O particles, the increase in the dose needed to disrupt recognition memory in the rats when retested nine months following the original test may have resulted from the reduction in the percentage of time the non-irradiated control rats spent exploring the novel object. Because the measure of the performance of the younger control subjects was not reliable (only 3 non-irradiated controls met criterion on the first test), it was not possible to statistically compare the performance of the radiated and control subjects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…When retested 8 months following the first test the non-irradiated controls (0 cGy) showed a reduction in the percentage of time spent with the novel object, failing to show a significant preference for the novel object. As such, there was no difference between the rats exposed to 16 O particles and the non-irradiated controls. With regard to the rats exposed to 28 Si particles, the effect of irradiation on cognitive function at two ages varied as a function of particle energy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations