2020
DOI: 10.1111/puar.13284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elevating the Case for Leadership Development Programs: Return on Investment Evaluations

Abstract: Competent leadership is essential to helping achieve agency missions. While governments around the globe invest in leadership development, most struggle to calculate the return on their investment (ROI). The lack of ROI evaluations makes it difficult to maintain leadership development budgets during financial crises and political changes. In this article we outline three methods for assessing ROI for leadership development.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Leadership development is considered an important strategic priority for public sector organisations given that skilled leaders are necessary for the effective implementation of policy and strategy (Subramony et al., 2018). Public sector literature suggests that leadership development programmes enhance capability and performance (Jacobsen et al., 2022) despite the difficulties in measuring return in investment (Abner et al., 2021). It is argued that development requires mixed methods training techniques (Seidle & Fernandez, 2016) which focus on both formal and informal activities, that move away from traditional approaches focused on individual traits and competencies (Jones et al., 2014).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leadership development is considered an important strategic priority for public sector organisations given that skilled leaders are necessary for the effective implementation of policy and strategy (Subramony et al., 2018). Public sector literature suggests that leadership development programmes enhance capability and performance (Jacobsen et al., 2022) despite the difficulties in measuring return in investment (Abner et al., 2021). It is argued that development requires mixed methods training techniques (Seidle & Fernandez, 2016) which focus on both formal and informal activities, that move away from traditional approaches focused on individual traits and competencies (Jones et al., 2014).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theme #2: Taking the lead UPM ensures that developmental resources are invested efficiently to produce set of dynamic leaders that can consciously make a difference (Abner et al, 2021;McCarron et al, 2023) in every facet of national economy. The educational institution consistently empowers youth to take decisive action and become responsible in adding value to the social development of their community (IsDB, 2019).…”
Section: Theme #1: Enhancing Creative Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Henceforth, the higher the ROI, the greater the financial return, the better use of financial resources (Mun, 2021;Schueler & Phil, 2020). The ROI methodology in training and development is systematically applied to measure the rate of return on the cost associated with training and development interventions (Abner, Valdez & Perry, 2021;Nemec, 2018;Olexová, 2018;Schueler & Phil, 2020). Jack Phillips proposed the measurement of ROI, which was adopted from Kirkpatrick's four levels of evaluation and added a fifth level (Weninger, 2020).…”
Section: Return On Investment (Roi)mentioning
confidence: 99%